I'm 35 weeks with my second baby, and currently it's head down back to back. I've heard that a labouring with a back to back baby is far more painful and more likely to need some sort of intervention. Is this true? Was wondering if anyone has any experience of it?
Had an elective C Section with my first (he was breech) with no complications. Im not against having another section, it's just the recovery part that puts me off a bit. On the other hand, I don't really want to put myself through a really difficult VBAC and end up needing an emergency one anyway...
So if anyone has a crystal ball out there, that would be super helpful!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Pregnancy choices
VBAC vs CSection
1 reply
SephrinaX · 19/12/2019 22:32
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.