This is a Premium feature
To use this feature subscribe to Mumsnet Premium - get first access to new features see fewer ads, and support Mumsnet.Start using Mumsnet Premium
Warwickshire County Council using explicit sex education materials in schools(31 Posts)
If you haven’t heard this story which has been circulating on SM for a few weeks, Warwickshire County Council have been found to be promoting/using a site called “Respect Yourself” for sex education in the county.
The website is deeply disturbing and details what can only be described as niche sexual practices as well as actively promoting porn as a positive thing. Bear in mind this site is aimed at children as young as 13.
A petition has been set up calling on WCC to revoke their decision to use the site and can be found here: www.change.org/p/warwickshire-county-council-stop-warwickshire-cc-normalising-the-use-of-pornography-by-children-s
In the link is a letter outlining some of the many concerns about this site. I’ll post the full text in the next post.
Please sign and share the petition.
Text of letter:
We, the undersigned, have grave concerns about Warwickshire County Council’s (WCC) endorsement of the ‘Respect Yourself’ website. We urge WCC to withdraw the site and review the processes which have led to inaccurate and potentially harmful information on the website being published.
‘Respect Yourself’, aimed at young people aged 13-25, describes degrading or dangerous sadomasochistic practices inspired by pornography, such as ‘cock and ball torture’ and ‘bukkake’. The site acknowledges that many practices it describes can be painful, e.g. anal sex, but it fails to address the fact that young women usually experience it as painful, risky and coercive.
Whilst it is understandable that children and young people will be curious about sex, the detailed descriptions of niche sadomasochistic practices are unnecessary. It is likely that a young person reading this website would understand from this that these practices are a normal part of sex.
We would remind you that this website says it is aimed at children as young as 13, although queries from younger children have been shared, including a plea from a 12-year-old girl asking for help with what she described as an addiction to pornography. The response to this question exemplifies our concerns: having said that she stays up half the night masturbating and watching pornography, and has a crush on her teacher, the girl is informed that this is ‘perfectly natural’. The harmful and addictive effects of porn are not mentioned.
Watching pornography is described on this website as being no different to going to the cinema, and as an area where women can out-earn men and have higher self-esteem and job satisfaction. It says that female porn stars are ‘in control’ and dismisses any suggestion that pornography may have a negative impact on society. It doesn't address the negative impact on children.*
*We note that the Pornography section of the website is now under review.
Adults have a responsibility to set parameters when it comes to the protection of children. There is no justification for normalising the use of pornography amongst children. A brief summary of some of the negative consequences of pornography use are outlined below:
Harmful Sexual Behaviour
●Studies show that adolescent consumption of pornography is associated with stronger belief in sexist stereotypes, more casual sex and higher levels of sexual aggression
●Women exposed to pornography as children are more likely to accept rape myths
●Men who use pornography are at increased risk of committing sexual offences
As such, in failing to condemn the use of pornography the Respect Yourself guidance is effectively sacrificing the best interests of women and girls in order to seem ‘sex positive.’ The poorly reasoned approach of Respect Yourself will undoubtedly prevent many adolescents in Warwickshire from enjoying healthy, mutually enjoyable sexual relationships in adulthood.
Addiction and Escalation
The impact of viewing pornography on the adolescent brain is an area of particular concern; for both boys and girls watching online pornography can alter grey matter, which may lead to a change in sexual tastes. At a life stage where boys and girls form crucial attitudes, preferences and expectations for their future, pornography’s influence is particularly strong and long-lasting.
●Boys exposed to pornography at a young age not only use it more as adults, but are also likely to have pornographic ideas invade their ‘real-life’ sexual experiences, lowering their levels of sexual satisfaction (ibid)
●Their tastes are also more likely to escalate to ‘deviant’ material (in particular, material depicting the abuse of animals and children
Grooming & Familial Estrangement
●Watching online porn is associated with young people reporting a poor emotional bond with their caregiver
●Exposure to pornography is known to be woven into the process of grooming
It is imperative that any disclosure that a child has seen pornography should be deemed a safeguarding concern.
● Frequency of pornography use amongst women and men is positively linked to body image insecurity and to increased anxiety in romantic relationships
At a time when so many children report experiencing poor mental health it is irresponsible to ignore the detrimental impact that watching pornography has on self-esteem and body image.
Whilst there is arguably some merit in encouraging children to speak openly about their concerns, the advice offered on the Respect Yourself website minimises the proven risks from pornography. It is perfectly possible to be positive about sex and healthy relationships whilst critiquing pornography and the abusive practices within it; indeed this is the backbone of responsible Relationships and Sex Education.
The Disrespect Nobody website produced by the Home Office offers comprehensive advice on healthy relationships. Unlike the Respect Yourself guidance, addiction to online pornography is acknowledged and visitors to the website are signposted to support; in addition a powerful testimony from a pornography-addicted child is offered. Conversely, Warwickshire’s Respect Yourself guidance asserts that there is ‘no evidence’ that pornography is addictive.
Guidance produced by the Department of Education notes ‘use of technology has become a significant component of many safeguarding issues’ pointing out that ‘being exposed to illegal, inappropriate or harmful material; for example pornography’ is a core ‘area of risk’ with regard to online safety. With the upcoming introduction of Age Verification technology to restrict children’s access to pornography sites, the UK has become a leader in the fight against pornography.
By failing to acknowledge harmful and addictive nature of online pornography, Warwickshire County Council have fallen out of step with both government and leading researchers in the field. We ask that Warwickshire County Council remove the Respect Yourself guidance and undertake an investigation into how such poorly researched and partisan guidance came to be offered to children and young people.
We hope Warwickshire County Council will heed these concerns and take action to keep children safe. In anticipation of a swift and positive response
Safe Schools Alliance UK and Click Off
 Marston C, Lewis R (2014),Anal heterosex among young people and implications for health promotion: a qualitative study in the UK, BMJ [https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/4/8/e004996 } (accessed 06.10.2019)
 Eran Shor, “Age, Aggression, and Pleasure in Popular Online Pornographic Videos,” Violence Against Women (2018): 1‒19, doi: 10.1177/1077801218804101.
 Elizabeth Paolucci-Oddone, Mark Genuis, and Claudio Violato, “A Meta-Analysis of the Published Research on the Effects of Pornography,” The Changing Family and Child Development, ed. Claudio Violato, Elizabeth Paolucci, and Mark Genuis (Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing, 2000), 48–59.
 John D. Foubert, Matthew W. Brosi, and R. Sean Bannon, “Effects of Fraternity Men’s Pornography Use on Bystander Intervention, Rape Myth Acceptance and Behavioral Intent to Commit Sexual Assault,” Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention 18, no. 4 (2011): 212–231.
 Norman Doidge, (2013) ‘Brain scans of porn addicts: what's wrong with this picture?’ The Guardian, 26th September
 Jochen Peter and Patti M. Valkenburg, “Adolescents’ Exposure to Sexually Explicit Internet Material and Sexual Satisfaction: A Longitudinal Study” Communications Research 35, no. 5 (2009): 171–194. doi:10.1111/j.1468- 2958.2009.01343.x.
 Eileen M. Alexy, Ann W. Burgess, and Robert A. Prentky, “Pornography Use as a Risk Marker for an Aggressive Pattern of Behavior among Sexually Reactive Children and Adolescents,” Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association 14, no. 4 (2009): 442–453.
 5 Michele L. Ybarra and Kimberly Mitchell, “Exposure to Internet Pornography among Children and Adolescents: A National Survey,” CyberPsychology & Behavior 8, no. 5 (2005): 473–486.
 Kimberly Mitchell et al., Trends in Youth Reports of Sexual Solicitations, Harassment and Unwanted Exposure to Pornography on the Internet 120-122, JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH 40 (2007), at www.unh.edu/ccrc/pdf/CV135.pdf (last visited Jul. 20, 2017) (on file with the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children).
 Julie M. Albright, “Sex in America Online: An Exploration of Sex, Marital Status, and Sexual Identity in Internet Sex Seeking and Its Impacts,” Journal of Sex Research 45 (2008): 175–186, doi:10.1080/00224490801987481
 HOME OFFICE, Disrespect Nobody [online] www.disrespectnobody.co.uk/ 2019 (accessed 03.10.2019)
 DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION, Keeping Children Safe in Education, [Online}. 2015 (accessed 03.10.2019)
A request to sign a petition, but no link to any details on what we’re supposed to be protesting against? No thanks.
@StillCoughing, there’s plenty of detail in the second post.
No, there is detail on why YOU think this shouldn’t be taught. There’s no confirmation of what is ACTUALLY being taught.
The petition will do nothing.
Personally I think as much information as possible is better than not enough information when it comes to sex education.
If parents don't want their teens to view this site then they need to block it and monitor their child's internet use because if they aren't getting the information from a website like this I can guarantee they will be getting it from somewhere else.
And most importantly, talk to your kids about sex.
Tell them yourself about coercion, consent, the unrealistic image projected by porn, and so on. Tell them the facts, all of them, and answer their questions.
If more parents talked to their kids in an open and honest way about sex then there wouldn't be a need for these websites.
The petition is not mine, it’s something I happen to agree with and think should be shared. If you disagree that’s your prerogative, I’m not forcing anyone to sign it.
Here’s a bit more background info on the story from a Twitter thread: twitter.com/hubblevicky/status/1176758148721512448?s=21
Signed. I saw the material. It's pretty shocking really.
Yeah as stories that circulate on social media as usually fine examples of accuracy, truth and not being offended for the hell of it
Warwickshire CC have confirmed it is one of their resources and that they’re happy with the content.
I saw the material. It's pretty shocking really.
If you think that's shocking you should see what a 12 year old can find on their mobile phone.
We can take these messages out of school but if you think that 12/13 year olds don't see this kind of stuff in a different setting you're deluding yourself. It gets passed around chat groups, "disgusting" sex acts but without context.
Personally I'd prefer teachers taught this stuff rather than children seeing it all online and thinking it's all normal/expected sexual behaviour.
I totally agree that sex education should be taught in schools, but surely it should be balanced and evidence based - telling 13yos there’s nothing wrong in watching porn when there is overwhelming evidence that it IS harmful, not to mention what an exploitative industry it is.
Of course parents should be open with their children and discuss the issues surrounding sex and relationships, but that doesn’t automatically mean we should go into the ins and outs of degrading sexual practices.
Signed, l can’t get my head around this at all.
Personally I'd prefer teachers taught this stuff rather than children seeing it all online and thinking it's all normal/expected sexual behaviour.
Sure. Let's have teachers teaching kids all about bukkake, anal fisting and golden showers in minute detail, and let's not forget to teach them that this is totes normal and healthy. I mean, girls gotta know that it's so damn liberated and empowering to be sexually degraded, innit.
Also, I don't think many teachers signed up for this shit. They signed up for, you know, teaching, not discussing sexual deviations and perversions with adolescents. I feel sorry for them. If you want kids taught about this stuff, go do it yourself.
(Another reason why I gave up on the idea of teaching, I guess...)
I am a big fan of open and honest discussion about sex but this website is horrendous. It doesn’t just talk about extreme sexual practices it promotes and normalises them. Yes I am sure you can see worse on the internet but not from an organisation displaying itself as an educational site. This is not education but grooming. I was happy to sign the petition.
Yikes just had a look at the site , that’s way above what 13 year olds need to know .. Jesus ..
I really feel sorry for the teachers. Why do kids need to know about golden showers or anal sex at 13, can’t imagine teaching this !
Can you link to the offending pages please? I read the fisting one and don't see anything wrong with it, it's certainly not promoting it.
Really? Nothing wrong with it?
Unless the message is anything other than 'if a guy wants to do this to you, kick him in the balls and RUN', there's plenty wrong with it.
There's a long thread in feminism about the site. Most of the issues are outlined in the letter.
It's a really good letter, thanks for posting @CaveMum. I've signed. Councils should not be funding pro-porn websites and publishing wank fodder.
Is that the site that says porn is one of the few industries where women are better paid than men, and that having a group of men ejaculate over you can be empowering?
Is that the one where it tells a girl that if she prefers a female for intimate examinations, she might want to consider why that is, and implies that this is a burden on the NHS?