Advanced search

What's for lunch today? Take inspiration from Mumsnetters' tried-and-tested recipes in our Top Bananas! cookbook - now under £10

Find out more

What’s important..time or money?

(19 Posts)
BubblesPip Sat 04-Nov-17 14:19:10

I’m feeling very conflicted at present. I’m a single mum to a 18 month old Dd. I currently work three nights over a fortnight and earn just enough to get by, with an occasional treat for my daughter. But have lots of time with my Dd.
I have the potential to earn pretty good money, but it’d mean that I miss out on a lot of time with my Dd. I’d have to do long 12-14 hour shifts at least 3-4 days a week.

So what’s more important for my Dd? Me being there, or her being able to do more activities, have holidays and live in a bigger house? I’d also love to be able to save to give her a lump sum of money when she’s older, but can’t save money at present. It’s very hard to know what the right thing is to do

Justbookedasummmerholiday Sat 04-Nov-17 14:23:09

I personally wouldn't worry about the lump sum.
My lp friend went without for many years to save for her ds.
When he was 18 she gave him 7k and he wasted it in 10 months. Not a jot to show for it.
One dd and a dm only need a 2 bed house.
Your time is precious to her until school age when I would say is the right time to increase hours. Imo.

Adviceplease360 Sat 04-Nov-17 14:23:55

Time without a doubt.

PotteringAlong Sat 04-Nov-17 14:25:14

Time. BUT working 3 days would still mean you have plenty of time and more money, which surely would be win win?

whatithink Sat 04-Nov-17 14:28:27

Time definitely. As they get older and start to want more expensive things it is hard to strike a balance. I still think time matters more then but kids don't really see that.

LuchiMangsho Sat 04-Nov-17 14:28:54

Time. I say this as a FT mum who works flexible hours. DH and I have given up tons of career opportunities for the kids. And we don't regret it one bit (and DH has always prioritised the kids over family). My mum also worked FT and she said when I had DS1 that quality time was a con- that all kids want is time and so when I was off work not to plan stuff but to just spend that time with them.

Bearsinmotion Sat 04-Nov-17 14:31:49

Unfortunately the answer is different for everyone. DSis (also a single parent) made the decision to take time off from when her DS was 18months to reception age. She loved it, but now he’s a teenager she constantly worries about money, especially university fees.

DP and I both work full time and our DC have been in full time childcare since they were 9 months. We are saving as much as we can so that we can fund university and a housing deposit, and ideally so I can go part time when the DC are older.

One question I would ask is whether your potential to earn will increase? By working now I am still moving up the career ladder, taking time off would make that impossible in my field. But if you are working in a job where that’s not the case I’d be more inclined to have a few years out...

chipscheeseandgravy Sat 04-Nov-17 14:39:41

Providing her and your basic needs are met I would stay continue doing the same as you are. Kids at that age don’t need an expensive foreign holiday, they don’t care if they dress is supermarket/basic clothes or designer. All they want is food, love and warmth.
Once she is at school you may be able to commit to more hours.

Having said that, her going to childcare/staying with a relative for a few days a week is not going to cause her emotional issues or ruin your relationship.

I work part time to allow more time with ds. He loves going to childminders a few hours a day. When he’s at school I can change my hours to suit school hours.

FlyingJellyfishInTheAttic Sat 04-Nov-17 14:43:33

Is there anyway of meeting in the middle? Say an extra shift a week? So only losing a little time but being able to save a little too?

Bunnychopz Sat 04-Nov-17 15:03:53

The lump sum saving thing is premature and low priority right now.

Can you do two shifts a week until she’s preschool age?

Time is

Catalufa Sat 04-Nov-17 15:59:00

Like other posters I think a good balance is the answer. So rather than choosing between time or money you find an in-between solution which gives you a reasonable amount of both.

EightyNine Sat 04-Nov-17 19:09:24

Time now. When she's about three and of an age where she can really communicate with others and so will maybe get more out of childcare and bond well with other kids and staff, then I'd say go for the money.... perhaps... it's a tough one!

Ilovelampandchair Sun 05-Nov-17 04:30:53

I'd take the work. You've a long life ahead of you and she will only be a little one for a small portion of that. In a few short years she'll be independent and you need to have a future for yourself.

3-4 days a week of long shifts still gives you 3-4 full days with her a week.

FucksakeCuntingFuckingTwats Sun 05-Nov-17 04:34:28

Right now time. When she starts upper school and you have to keep up with Joneses, like my thirteen year old. More money maybe increase hours then.

LaughingElliot Sun 05-Nov-17 05:03:29

I think it’s a hard one and I also think it changes. Sometimes I have enjoyed working more and other times I have craved more time with the kids. The thing you definitely don’t want is to always be in a rush, stepping your child in and out of their car seat, saying c’mon c’mon, always rushing through dinner time. But if you can work and still go at a child’s pace a lot of the time then that’s perfect.

TotemIcePole Sun 05-Nov-17 05:09:10

You say at least 3-4 days? Could it be more? 60 hours?

Could you look at doing these longer days in 2.5 years time, when she starts school?

mindutopia Mon 06-Nov-17 10:24:37

At that age, I would say time. When she's older, closer to preschool/school age, I would want to start shifting to earning more and planning for the future (easier because you'll get funded hours at nursery/free school).

BubblesPip Mon 06-Nov-17 10:35:07

Thank you all. It’s interesting that we all have different views on what’s important. It’s so hard to find that balance. I think I’ll feel guilty either way. I think I’m going to increase my hours slightly, so we have a little more money, but not lose too much time together smile

BackforGood Mon 06-Nov-17 10:35:38

I would say to meet in the middle too.
There's no point in working 12 - 14 hour shifts x 5 or 6 days a week unless you have to, as you'd never see her, but 3 days a week gives you plenty of time (not sure how your childcare works as obviously it would be difficult and expensive for long shifts, but then I'd have though it was difficult for night shifts too). Or another night shift a week (does that mean you then sleep all day? Will depend on the job / what time counts as 'a might shift').
Also it needn't be the same now as when she moves to school, or when she gets that bit older.

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now »

Already registered? Log in with: