comments about only children(6 Posts)
hi I just feel like I need to rant! I went out with my colleagues today and someone with 2 kids was telling me how only children are spoilt. I told him that you can't generalize it as I know some only children not like that but he kept going on about how he couldn't just have one child etc .. and 95% of only children are self centered and don't share etc...
I got really angry deep down as I know I might never have another child as my DH doesn't want it.
arghhh so annoying, why do people always talk about only children but it's ok to have more than one!
Hi OP if it's any consolation I think the only child spoilt stereotype is a complete myth. Being spoilt depends on the wider family circumstances not on how many brothers/sisters a child has got. In any case, what does spoilt actually mean? It seems such an imprecise word to me.
I've known only children who've had REALLY tough upbringings - i.e. in one case - not enough food to eat - this is in a developed country - the UK. How on earth could he be spoilt? We have a benefits system in this country to make sure that even children from the poorest families eat reasonably adequately. He didn't have enough food because he had a neglectful, feckless mother. I also know another only child - severely beaten by his father. Again - how is this spoilt? Any one using this erroneous stereotype is imo emotionally immature and is deliberately trying to bring another person down as well as being narrow minded. Another only child was brought up by an abusive, neglectful, alcoholic mother. Spoilt? I don't think so.
To look at this from another angle, if we were to take this 'spoilt' argument to it's logical conclusion you could argue that the vast majority of people are ' spoilt' in the UK compared to average people in developing/third countries as we have much better health care, a much better standard of living - we don't have to walk 10 miles barefoot every day to get clean water!!
About the not sharing argument - all children learn to share soon enough in school/nursery. Also, in an affluent country now like the UK, siblings usually have their own toys etc anyway, and don't have to share - especially so with siblings with a bigger age gap whose would need very different 'toys' and forms of entertainment.
I read a very good book on this subject which confirmed that the negative only child stereotypes are a TOTAL myth - the only thing which only children MAY be more likely to be affected by and this is very much JUST a maybe - is that they are the only ones 'told off' in that particular family situation - so this in SOME circumstances may effect them negatively -(not, I don't think if parents are broadminded and rational).
The only other thing that this book alluded to is that because only children don't have anyone who 'knows' their parents exactly like they do - it takes them longer to realise that their parents may be 'getting it wrong' in some areas. Again, only a maybe, and it may not affect them negatively anyway.
I also think that only children are perhaps, more likely to have to deal with difficult family situations on their own at some point - but, far from being a negative thing, this could give them confidence.!! So for example, an only child can walk into a room where they don't know anyone, think 'well, I'm an only child, I've coped with difficult situations on my own - this social gathering should be a breeze' and have the confidence to walk up to someone and break the ice!!
Hope this helps!!
I just wanted to add as well - despite all the differences that may be talked/written about in the media etc - I think that both only children and children with siblings ultimately need the same thing - confidence. Only children need confidence as they may have to face difficult family situations on their own and children with siblings also need confidence in order to deal confidently and assertively with siblings.
Of course, children with siblings may have to deal with difficult family situations on their own as well, that scenario isn't necessarily exclusive to only children but, you know what I mean!
Guy sounds an idiot - sure he has a range of idiotic views on a eyed range of subjects
In my experience I have found that often the youngest or eldest children get sploilt (and not saying this because I am a middle childbecause I am not) because they are the first or last to do something and it holds more significance/value
God, if someone shared those stupid views with me I'd be very tempted to start saying that all multiple children bicker and argue more as having multiple children makes them 'compete' for their parents attention - which is utter nonsense, just like his view is. I guess a more appropriate response would be to point out there are pros and cons to any number of children and the only 'right' number is the number that both parents agree on.
What a load of tosh! id ask him if he has a sibling (presume so) and say well that proves that his attention seeking rant proves that all siblings are attention deprived and as a result spend their lives trying to grab the limelight off others as they have always had to share it (prob not true but neither was his point)
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.