Nursery changing the goalposts re:free hours for 3 years olds.

[Delatron]

When my son started nursery last year I checked with the nursery about the free hours and was told that I could take them over 2 days rather than spread out over the week. So 1 and a half days were funded and I would pay for half a day. This appealed to me as I didn't want my son to do a couple of hours each day.

Now the nursery are saying there has been an audit and the council have changed the parameters and the hours should have been spread across 3 days and I am liable for a certain amount of money which runs in to the hundreds of pounds.

Surely this is the nursery's error? I don't want any bad feeling but I am reluctant to pay them. If I had known this I would have used a different preschool and spread the hours out, I was only going along with their advice.

Is this legal? Isn't this an issue between the nursery and the council?

Any advice much appreciated.

[Sirzy]

As far as I am aware to take the full 15 hours it has to be spread over 3 days at least. If its only over 2 days the maximum which can be used is the equivalent to 12

[Delatron]

Thanks, so do you think the nursery at fault for telling me that it was fine over 2 days or should I have known otherwise?! I guess I just have to suck it up, pay up and be more careful in future.

[SherbetDibDab]

Different authorities have different rules, I would contact your council and explain the situation, the nursery should be able to give you a contact. Did you attend 52 weeks a year, that could increase the hours you to whic you were entitled. Again this all depends on the individual council.
But I think whether you pay the nursery is a legal issue, I don't think it's right to pass the problem over to you.

[Delatron]

Thanks Sherbet, if different councils have different rules then I would assume the onus is on the nursery to make sure they are complying rather than the parent?

He went every week but only for 2 days per week.

Will contact the council and see what they say. Don't want to get the nursery in to trouble but I did not budget for extra Childcare bills at this time of year.

[fledtoscotland]

My understanding is that it has to be 5 sessions so if a morning is one session and an afternoon another, he has to be in a minimum of 2.5days to get the full 15hrs.

This is the way it works for us. I usually don't bother with the single afternoon session as its in the way of school runs but it's there if I need it.

[baublesandbaileys]

we're not allowed to condense it, it has to be taken by half sessions not double sessions

[Delatron]

Thanks Fledtoscotland. It is confusing. I changed him recently to 3 mornings, 5 hours each, so not sure if this is even covered? Don't want this to happen again so I will have to speak to the council.

I guess the issue is if the nursery say it is fine, can they turn around a year down the line and say no it wasn't fine and charge me for the backdated year? Not sure legally who is at fault.

[Delatron]

Baubles, was this something you found out yourself or did your nursery make this clear? Thanks.

[baublesandbaileys]

think we found out ourselves, it means we don't claim all our hours but we do pay to top up the days as lots of short days are no good to us and we need a couple of long days for work, so even though we are underclaiming we are paying more than if we did more days IYKWIM

[Delatron]

Ok thanks. I did check with the nursery and they said it was fine to condense it all together. So not sure if they are able to turn around a year later and say it is not? Am just wondering where the liability is; parents or the nursery.

[nannynick]

Some councils publish the EYEE funding rules on their website, sometimes in something called a Provider Guide.

I feel the nursery are at fault as they incorrectly advised you and incorrectly claimed on your behalf.

Contact the council early years department and see if they can help clarify the position with regard to funding this term, next term and summer term.

[baublesandbaileys]

if the nursery gave you misleading info then that is wrong, but by "liable" if you mean who will have to pay, then I'd say its you I don't think you'll still get the longer days for free

[gallicgirl]

You should talk to your MP too. If government is serious about getting parents into work, then they've got to be more flexible with child care.

[Mandy21]

I think if you were told you would be paying for half a day, then that is all they can ask you to pay - but you have to be clear on what you were told. If things have changed going forward, then they can tell you what future charges you'll incur (presumably with the option then of you going elsewhere) but they shouldn't be backdating it.

[mercibucket]

I can't see how they can backdate it tbh. They can ask but I would just say no. Do you have legal advice on your house insurance?

[mercibucket]

I can't see how they can backdate it tbh. They can ask but I would just say no. Do you have legal advice on your house insurance?

[Delatron]

Thanks all. Yes that is what I had the issue with, the backdating. I have actually changed the hours recently to 3 mornings so now it is fine but they are backdating it to Spring/Summer last year. They claim that the council have changed their criteria, have done an audit and they won't get the funding they thought and therefore want the shortfall off me.

[Delatron]

Will check if we have legal advice on the home insurance, I am not sure we have.

I think a few other parents are affected, I can't see everyone paying up, the nursery have just given out wrong information I guess and I now trying to claw back funding that they won't be getting.

[baublesandbaileys]

well that doesn't sound right at all! I'd be suspicious and ask for a break down on paper of exactly what they have claimed and received for you so you can take that to the local office

[Delatron]

Yeah I am suspicious! I'm just worried the council may say I should have checked and not taken the nursery's word for it and I may end up being liable for more!

[LucyLastik]

At the preschool I previously worked in, we offered flexible entitlement which meant parents could claim their 15 hours over 5 days or 2.5 days. It is the same in the school nursery I now work in, the majority do their 15 hours over 5 mornings or afternoons but one child claims them over 2.5 days. There are strict rules on how NEF is applied so I would second the advice about contacting your local EY dept.

[Delatron]

Thanks Lucy, I am sure they gave me the wrong information and are trying to cover their backs now. It doesn't seem as though any nursery/preschool can offer the hours over just 2 consecuctive days. I just don't know why they told me it would be fine though? Maybe they thought the council wouldn't check.

Will check if my 3 morning sessions are covered as I don't want this happening again.

[Arion]

They gave you wrong information, my dd qualified for her nursery place Jan 11 and it was the case then that you had to split over different sessions. I think your mornings still won't work as it needs to be 5 sessions of 3 hours (so 5 mornings, 5 afternoons or two days and a half day). They shouldn't be able to backdate, we had awful trouble with ours and they wiped off about a thousand pounds they said we owed 'as a gesture of goodwill' but basically they'd fucked up on what they'd told us!
Your council will have a section dedicated to early years and they should be able to help (ours were brilliant but nursery HQ took months to arrange the meetings hence the large bill!)

One v important point is you only get funding for 38 weeks (same as school terms). If you want your dc in every week you will be liable for the additional weeks. If you don't want to pay, the nursery should be able to offer term time places (so you basically keep them off on holiday weeks). The funded nursery place has to be "free at the point of access" so they can't put barriers in place that mean you have to pay ie deposit, no option for term time place.

[BellaOfTheBalls]

Agree with Arion re the hours over the year. Nursery funding covers term time only so if your DC has been every week regardless of half terms/school holidays etc then unfortunately you will probably be liable for those hours.

It does vary from education authority to education authority and nurseries themselves can AFAIK make certain requests as to what days or pattern these fall into. For instance; DS1's original Playgroup was open 9-2 4x a week, he could do all his funded hours there over 3 days but only if I paid for the fourth day. His nursery in a different area following our move said he had to do his hours over a minimum of 3 days.

Its a tricky one and I would ring your LEA for advice in the first instance as they may be able to advise both you and the nursery. It doesn't sound like the nursery are actually dealing with the situation in the right way at all. Would definitely look to see if you have legal advice on your house insurance or perhaps speak to CAB. If you look at it from the nursery perspective; if they have not followed the protocols it may be that they do not receive any of the funding money for your DC and are therefore running the risk of a massive financial loss. That's obviously not your fault but I suspect they might be hoping you'll blindly say "I'm so sorry, who do I make the cheque out to"

Good luck OP!

[Delatron]

Thanks Arion and Bella. Yes I knew I had to pay for holidays so that is all up to date. Will definitely speak to the council and make sure I can do my 3 mornings. But if as you say Bella nurseries can make special requests then I guess the onus is on the nursery to tell me what they have agreed with the council? I will need to get it in writing so that this doesn't happen again.

It is exactly as you say, the nursery have messed up and will not get the funding they thought for a number of children. This will have financial implications for them and I do feel a bit sorry for them. I don't know if I just offer to pay half. They must be expecting parents to kick up a bit of a fuss. I just don't like confrontation and bad feeling!