I'm posting this in Multiple births firstly because it being twins might make a difference to the estimated weights, and secondly because mothers of multiples are more likely to have had multiple/late scans.
My query is about the estimated weights that result from the head/abdominal/femur scan measurements. I have been tracking my estimated weights with fascination (first children!), but I wonder how indicative they are of actual birth weight.
The only friend I have who had a late scan (singleton baby) was estimated to be carrying a nine pounder, which resulted in an induced labour at term to avoid excessive growth. It turned out the baby was only 7lb something, so perhaps things could have been left a little longer and an induction avoided.
I am not worried about the estimated weights I have been given, and I'm unlikely to make it to 40 weeks given my twin pregnancy, but just out of interest, how close were your estimated weights to your actual birth weights?
When do you start showing with twins? What is life with twins like? Join the conversation on our Multiple Births forum.
Multiple births
For those who had growth scans, how accurate were your estimated weights
HappyAsASandboy · 11/10/2010 21:09
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.