Advanced search

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. Free legal advice is available from a Citizen's Advice Bureau, and the Law Society can supply a list of local solicitors.

I've just contributed to the consultation on cohabitation rights. What does anyone else think?

(4 Posts)
Totallytrapped Wed 31-May-06 22:54:54

Clearly there are many reasons for cohabiting rather than marrying. In my own case, one of the most significant reasons is a strong desire to avoid giving my partner any claim on my assets. Another reason is reluctance to unite myself any further with a man who is consistently unwilling to contribute in even the smallest way either to the financial or practical running of a home and family.

During the 3 years we have cohabited (the last two of which have been with our small daughter), I have:
Paid the mortgage
Paid the bills
Worked virtually full time
Paid for and managed all childcare
Taken care of the baby
Paid for all baby-related items
Cleaned and managed the house

He has:
Not worked a single paid day
Not sought employment
Helped out with perhaps 5% of childcare
Lived off money from his parents

I have had a wonderful daughter with a completely unsuitable man. That is my personal blessing and curse. I live with it, and try to ensure that we all enjoy family life. However, I would be incensed if I thought that my parasitic boyfriend might end up earning any more from our current situation than the simple joy of living with his daughter.

Following the rulings on Miller and Macfarlane there will certainly be many who choose cohabitation over marriage precisely to avoid the division of assets. I believe as strongly as anyone, that good cohabitation is just as loving, secure and consensual as good marriage. However, it is naive not to think that in many cases cohabitation does signal a reluctance on one or both sides to commit fully, whether for emotional, financial or other reasons.

The best that legislation can do then is to make sure that cohabitees are well-informed and able to opt INTO the same rights as married people. Otherwise, those of us who choose not to marry will have nowhere else to go.

nicnack2 Wed 31-May-06 22:59:04

i tend to agree with you. although i am married i would not of like my previous bf who i lived with and who lived of me to have been given legal rights to my assets just cos he lived with me.

Piffle Wed 31-May-06 23:00:07

Well on first view it would allow your parasitic boyf many of your assets ?
In NZ when I left they had de facto couple law, which if you had been living together for 2 yrs or more, then providing you had proper evidence -receipts)of shared bills then you could claim for division as a married couple.

I am in a most vulnerable position, however I am SAHM, engaged, living tog for 5 yrs with one dd... he owns house in his name, despite £10 k of my money going into doing up his old house to sell it to invest in new one
WE're sound, even his parents have told me if anything happens to him, they'd sign it all to me.
But shit thats trust huh
So we've just made legal declarations, despite planning to wed... this year

sobernow Wed 31-May-06 23:11:56

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now »

Already registered? Log in with: