Advanced search


(2 Posts)
Twinkle2012 Sun 25-Nov-12 10:57:35

Hi all

I'm looking for advice..

We have just had a failed IVF and FET with the
Bridge Centre - we are unexplained although they did diagnose an out of phase lining which they treated during the FET but cycle still failed..

I really rate the Bridge Centre but I can't help feeling they are a little pedantic and not so good at thinking to far out side of the box.

I had heard good things about ARGC but having done a little research I can see that the clinic has been linked to a Panorama investigation, a GMC investigation and quite a lot of controversy surrounding high success rates.

The ARGC also seem v interested in NK cells and I had a diagnosis from a clinic we had initial investigations with that mine were high. However, the Bridge do not believe that NK cells in the blood stream can impact implantation.

So, do I stick with the Bridge and put my failure down to statistics or do I move on to the ARGC who look like they are an "all guns blazing" kind of clinic with high success rates albeit it somewhat controversial??

Has any one had dealings / success with ARGC?

I thought I'd made a decision to start afresh at new clinic in January but now I am panicking!

Thanks all x

Nancy66 Mon 26-Nov-12 10:47:37

There are other clinics that do believe in treating immune issues (the raised NK cell problem) other than the ARGC.

ones that spring to mind are:

Zita West
The Lister

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now