My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

News

Vatican in dispute with Israel

12 replies

monkeytrousers · 30/07/2005 10:10

here

If Israel were a friend of mine, I'd be telling them they needed some prozac, counselling and a long time to think things over..

OP posts:
Report
assumedname · 30/07/2005 10:14

...'it's not all bad for the English to find out what it's like'

She's obviously missed the IRA and the Blitz!

Report
monkeytrousers · 30/07/2005 10:20

How do you sympatise with people who will only allow you to do so if you relinquish all of your critical faculties? It's just am impossible position. Crazy!

OP posts:
Report
Caligula · 30/07/2005 10:58

Unbelievable. But strangely predictable.

Report
piffle · 30/07/2005 11:04

who's not in dispute with Israel?
America

Report
saadia · 30/07/2005 15:11

Typical

Report
donnie · 30/07/2005 15:17

well, that comment of Judy Sharon sums up, IMO, the whole Israeli attitude. They infuriate me!

Report
monkeytrousers · 30/07/2005 17:56

Imagine the reaction if someone was so openly conteptuous about Israel? Bet we can all recite the script.

OP posts:
Report
monkeytrousers · 31/07/2005 10:13

Has anyone heard of this forum before? Is it a far right group? littlegreenfootballs

It's utterly illogical and reactionary.

OP posts:
Report
monkeytrousers · 31/07/2005 10:19

Wikipedia calls it a 'hate site'. This was their take on that.."Since when is potraying the TRUTH about Islamonazoids "hate"?"

OP posts:
Report
yingers74 · 01/08/2005 23:19

Israel have been attacked/threatened for so long politically and militarily that I think they are as a country pretty reactionary and defensive.

However, the pope and the catholic church are in no position to take the higher ground. They failed to condemn hitler and his atrocities against jews, the disabled and gypsies, as well as the various dictators that caused havoc in south america.

Report
Chandra · 01/08/2005 23:38

In a 1,300-word communique, the Vatican said: "It has not always been possible to follow every attack against Israel with a public declaration of condemnation."

It said one reason for this was that "the attacks on Israel were sometimes followed by immediate Israeli reactions not always compatible with the norms of international law ... It would thus be impossible to condemn the [terrorist operations] and pass over the [Israeli retaliation] in silence".

I wouldn't get into detail about it, but I really like the second paragraph...

Report
monkeytrousers · 02/08/2005 09:54

Following that argument Vingers no one would be able to contribute to a debate.

And I'm not sure but haven't the Catholic church apoligised for their conduct during the occupations though?

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.