My feed
Premium
Please
or
to access all these features

News

Wacko-Jacko -- guilty, not guilty?

54 replies

sansouci · 05/03/2005 22:27

I would "guess" guilty. The story of the Jesus Juice really got to me.

OP posts:
Report
sparklymieow · 05/03/2005 22:28

Jesus juice?? I haven't been keeping up with this. I would say Guilty too

Report
sansouci · 05/03/2005 22:30

That's apparently what he called the wine he gave his victims... cringe!

OP posts:
Report
suzywong · 05/03/2005 22:30

oh god haven't read about that, will it be on the bbc website

anyway, guilty as hell, but I think his aides and staff should be tried a long side him, it is perposterous to think that no one once saide "stop it you freak, you're a grown man, don't be having boys to sleepover in your bed". Sad really. Looking forward to ex-gestator Debbie Rowe testifying

Report
wobblyknicks · 05/03/2005 22:30

Guilty as hell. If he's mentally a child then how does a child get into reading porn and become a world-renowned artist? If he's mentally an adult then it's called being a paedophile. Sorry, that's the way I see it!

Report
SPARKLER1 · 05/03/2005 22:31

I haven't kept up with the story at all. It all seems very odd though. Not sure what I think as haven't heard enough myself. Leaning towards guilty though.

Report
SPARKLER1 · 05/03/2005 22:31

I haven't kept up with the story at all. It all seems very odd though. Not sure what I think as haven't heard enough myself. Leaning towards guilty though.

Report
sansouci · 05/03/2005 22:32

oh yeah, suzywong, is she going to testify, too? I saw a programme about her not too long ago & she seemed v. rich & v. sad. Obviously keeping mum tho.

OP posts:
Report
Gwenick · 05/03/2005 22:33

I'm leaning towards guilty too - but then we're only hearing the bits the media want us to hear - and not the 'boring' (for the media to report that is) bits.

Report
sansouci · 05/03/2005 22:34

Does anyone know why Bashir wouldn't testify?

OP posts:
Report
sansouci · 05/03/2005 22:47

No, i'm not really obsessed! Intrigued, tho.

OP posts:
Report
turquoise · 05/03/2005 22:54

I think it's a combination of being a child in a man's body, and as SuzyWong says - his aides allowing him to do anything he wants. I don't think he's evil, I think he is completely on another planet and has no concept of reality whatsoever.

Report
joash · 05/03/2005 22:57

Let's face it, he's either guilty or a very, very stupid man.

Report
HunkerMunker · 05/03/2005 22:59

How are his children all so fair-skinned, blonde and blue-eyed?

Report
sparklymieow · 05/03/2005 22:59

They say he is a boy in a man body, TBH I don't care, he still shouldn't have kids over to sleep in his bed!!

Report
sparklymieow · 05/03/2005 23:00

all the bleach affected his sperm!!

Report
ButtonMoon · 05/03/2005 23:00

If a man in your street had a fairground in his garden (!?!) and invited boys over for parties and let them sleep in bed with him...what would you think?? It is classic grooming....the kids are obsessed with him...something has to be happening. They have found indecent pics of kids in his home!? DH reckons he'll commit suicide before the trial is over.... Guilty....but whatever the court decides..........

Report
wobblyknicks · 05/03/2005 23:00

Boys do NOT do what he does/did IME. It's all really weird and twisted, nothing he does seems to be normal boyish behaviour.

Report
sparklymieow · 05/03/2005 23:07

he is weird anyway, without all this! GUILTY!!

Report
Gwenick · 05/03/2005 23:08

HM - are his children really blond haired and blue eyes - don't think I've ever seen any pictures of them!

Report
HunkerMunker · 05/03/2005 23:10

They were in the documentary that Martin Bashir made.

Report
suzywong · 05/03/2005 23:16

Martin Bashir did take the stand but didn't answer very many questions as he was using a Californian law that allows journalists to protect their sources

I reckon Jacko will top himself for sure if he gets sent down, an no mistake

(oh dear I seem to have become a Sun Hill employee all of a sudden)

Report
sansouci · 05/03/2005 23:33

Yes, the so-called California shield law. Wonder why?

OP posts:
Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Tinker · 05/03/2005 23:34

Think he might top himself if he's found not guilty. Have to admit, am very curious as to what will happen to his face if/when he get sent down.

Report
tigermoth · 06/03/2005 06:52

tinker, I had exactly that same thought!

If Michael is guilty, his aids are guilty to some degree too, especially ones who were with him for years and years.

I think he's guilty of losing touch with reality - which means, yes, he is guilty.

Report
Amanda3266 · 06/03/2005 08:31

I started a thread about this a few weeks back and was honestly not sure then. Since then I've read a book about the Jordie Chandler case (from the early 1990s). He was the other child that Jackson supposedly abused. Initially I thought "yeah, yeah" on reading it - written by the boy's uncle etc. But having finished it I was sickened. I am absolutely certain now that he is guilty. I actually think he is a predatory paedophile. He claims to love children yey you will note that no little girls are his "special" friends.
I think the man has severe mental health problems, probably due to his dreadful upbringing - it doesn't excuse his actions but might explain them.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.