My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

News

Strangling and smothering your wife isn't murder if she was a nasty drunk apparently

11 replies

ICantBelieveIDidThis · 01/09/2018 19:47

www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/grandad-who-strangled-wife-death-15097325

This has been reported in the national and local press.

In the Daily Mail, the report states that some of the jurors smiled and waved at the defendant.

He has been found not guilty of murder and awaits sentencing for manslaughter.

OP posts:
Report
NapQueen · 01/09/2018 19:50

But murder and manslaughter have different definitions. No one is saying he didnt kill his wife. He himself has admitted he did.
A jury has found him not guilty of murder.
The next jury is almost certainly going to find him guilty of manslaughter.

Report
ICantBelieveIDidThis · 01/09/2018 19:52

He's been found guilty of manslaughter.

He's awaiting sentencing.

OP posts:
Report
NapQueen · 01/09/2018 19:56

Ah well there you go.

As I say the definition is different. A jury have to believe beyond all reasonable doubt that the grounds for murder were fulfilled. Clearly they did not come to that conclusion based on the evidence.

If there is a shred of doubt over the act of murder in its legal definition then they have to find him not guilty.

Report
Redteapot67 · 01/09/2018 19:56

I did read this thinking she didn’t get to say her side of it.
He could have been abusive and twisting it all on her (as abusive men do).
It’s shocking the jury did that

Report
moredoll · 01/09/2018 19:58

To be fair they might well have reached the same verdict if the wife had killed the husband for those reasons.

Report
ICantBelieveIDidThis · 01/09/2018 21:18

To be fair they might well have reached the same verdict if the wife had killed the husband for those reasons.

Unlikely.

Most women aren't strong enough to kill a conscious, struggling, adult man with their bare hands.

She would have had to have used a weapon and that alone would make her more likely to be convicted of murder.

OP posts:
Report
BMW6 · 02/09/2018 23:57

They probably could if he was pissed........

Report
Havabiscuit · 03/09/2018 01:09

His wife sounds a nightmare. I suppose it’s what you call “ mitigating circumstances so manslaughter not murder. Sad case all round.

Report
prh47bridge · 04/09/2018 13:55

Unlikely

Very likely. The available statistics show that women are far more likely to succeed with this type of defence than men.

Report
AnnieKenney · 04/09/2018 14:07

The available statistics show...

Could you please share these statistics? Ive tried searching but cant find them anywhere and would find them very useful. Thanks!

Report
alardi · 04/09/2018 14:17

If the wife had suffocated the stone dead drunk husband for years of EA including behaviour which seemed to hasten the daughter's death, many MNers would be very sympathetic. Wasn't that defence of Helen Archer last year? Pah.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.