here
If he did what he's accused of, far more action than making him apologise is required.
If he didn't, why on earth does he need to apologise?
The current stance by Clegg and others is ridiculous? Or is it me? I'm not surprised he won't apologise as (legally) he's not guilty of anything. Surely if he makes any kind of meaningful apology that would really implicate him. (i.e. would be an admission of guilt) I'm sure no-one's going to be happy with an I'm sorry if I was misunderstood type of apology.
If "they" think he's guilty of something he needs to apologise for why are they entertaining having back at all?
Apologies if there are other threads-I did look!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
I am very confused - Lord Rennard
131 replies
Domus · 20/01/2014 11:39
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.