Log in with:
Register to join the discussion, get discounts and more.
Please enter a valid email address.
Please check your email to confirm your account, and you'll be ready to go.
This is page 1 of 1 (This thread has 3 messages.)
m.bbc.co.uk/news/health-22307946If delayed cord cutting becomes the norm, does this mean no more cord blood banking?Interesting to read though - apparently 1/3 babies blood in placenta/cord when born. Presumably early cutting means baby loses 1/3 blood - that seems an awful lot...
It says if the mother chooses to have the injection to deliver the placenta then the cord should still be cut immediately though. I think most women have the injection, with my first three they just gave me the injection without asking.
This is really interesting. I was given the injection without having been asked first, too. I just assumed they had a good reason Definitely going to look into this (if the guidelines haven't been updated by the time my baby comes) and add it to my birthplan if it makes sense. 1/3 of the baby's blood? Wow.I've read about lotus births, and the supposed benefits that these babies get from not having their cord cut at all. Never considered it for myself though.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.