Advanced search

5 yr old girl "snatched" in Wales

(535 Posts)
mumblechum1 Tue 02-Oct-12 04:38:29

Let's all keep our eyes peeled sad

perceptionreality Fri 05-Oct-12 23:07:59

Ponders, seriously you think someone who does awful things will look like a demon or a monster?

Ian Huntley?
Joseph Mengele?
Any other serial killer?

You can't tell what anyone is capable of by looking at them. It's quite simply irrelevant.

NanaNina Fri 05-Oct-12 23:13:42

I am pleased that the police have been able to now arrest him on suspicion of murder rather than abduction, because of forensic evidence, which is of course of huge importance in these kind of cases. Thanks Perceptionreality for pointing that out. I didn't know either that Roy Whiting was convicted on forensic evidence alone.

Headinhands I think the thread has changed from criticising the parents, so not sure why it has been brought up again.

Pumpkin I think to say that he is guilty because he looks evil is a bit out of order to be honest. I know of course that feelings are running high at this awful incident.

I would hope that they charge can come quite soon if there is forensic evidence.

perceptionreality Fri 05-Oct-12 23:16:01

The point all along is that a child is far more likely to be harmed by someone they know well, Danielle Jones for example.

I think this man (if guilty) had been planning this for some time. It would have been much easier for him to take a child with whom he previously built a relationship of trust. Same with Ian Huntley - he was known to the girls and they therefore thought they could trust him. Complete stranger abductions are rare.

DuelingFanjo Fri 05-Oct-12 23:17:13

"He looks evil, everything points to him" yeah, that's such a persuasive argument you have there... I'm now completely convinced of his guilt. In fact why on earth haven't they charged him seeing as he looks so evil?


arthurfowlersallotment Fri 05-Oct-12 23:17:42

It was just reported on the news that forensic evidence led to the murder investigation.

RubixCube Fri 05-Oct-12 23:21:10

Woman batterers look normal and charming.So people on the outside world thinks his a lovely bloke.Just because someone looks normal doesn't mean they are.Its all in the head

Feenie Fri 05-Oct-12 23:24:35

Oh for god's sake, do we have to do the collective moronic 'he looks like a wrong 'un you know' AGAIN???

There is a mere fag paper between some of you lot and the mob who tried to lynch that paediatrician sometimes, I swear.

Ponders Fri 05-Oct-12 23:26:17

no, perceptionreality, I don't think that - I was responding to some who apparently do, & said he looks evil

perceptionreality Fri 05-Oct-12 23:29:11

Yes, sorry ponders I've just realised the wider context of your post. I don't understand why anyone thinks anyone could look evil or good - equally can't understand 'looks evil'!, especially these days - the way he looks is not relevant. He will have been detained due to evidence that he was involved.

pumpkinsweetie Sat 06-Oct-12 08:04:50

Its my opinion, im entitled to it and if they didn't have anything on him he would not still be detained.

noddyholder Sat 06-Oct-12 08:54:47

If they had sufficient to charge him I don,t think they would still be appealing to the public for info re his last movements it is very odd a bit like the man in the bristipol case where they extended questioning twice but had nothing and he was innocent.

noddyholder Sat 06-Oct-12 08:56:42

I thought anyone could be arrested on reasonable suspicion but need hard evidence to charge?

Ponders Sat 06-Oct-12 09:39:22

noddy, a couple of posters have said that once he's charged they can't question him any more, & they need to find out where she is. the appeals to the public re his movements after she disappeared are also all about finding her body

scaevola Sat 06-Oct-12 09:57:59

For the magistrates to have authorised the extension of his detention, the Bench has to be satisfied that there is the makings if a case against him (and the nature and strength if that has obviously not been released) and that there is a realistic prospect of securing more relevant evidence in the extra time. That might be further forensic results as well as information from sightings (they had over 2500 calls from the public to process).

If he is to be charged, we'll probably know by mid-afternoon (or if released, he'll be quietly out before the deadline so he move to somewhere where he will not be in immediate danger).

Appeals for sightings may assist the search. It's also important to any future case, for if he is claiming he was doing something unconnected to April's disappearance, he will not have to opportunity later to state that his version of events was not adequately investigated.

RubixCube Sat 06-Oct-12 15:41:51

His been charged.Scum evil evil scum

Ponders Sat 06-Oct-12 15:46:23

they're charging him with perverting the cause of justice too

because he won't tell them, presumably

Tiredmumno1 Sat 06-Oct-12 15:46:36

Charged with abduction, murder and perverting the course of justice.

RubixCube Sat 06-Oct-12 15:56:28

Why.Why would someone murder a defenceless child.Poor little girl she must have been so frightened.I feel so sad for her family

AlionalovesPan Sat 06-Oct-12 15:56:41

I don't think it's as clear as some people think. IF the police had convincing evidence they would have charged him a looong time ago.

4 days later and it's a last minute effort.

Feenie Sat 06-Oct-12 15:58:02

I imagine that more forensic evidence becomes available over time. sad

janey68 Sat 06-Oct-12 16:01:16

Its very strange- they would have charged him at any point up to now if they had enough evidence. So it's odd that it's so late in the day. Clearly they must have sufficient evidence to bring charges, but I pray to god they have the right person, otherwise someone is still out there who did this

ChristineDaae Sat 06-Oct-12 16:04:23

Oh my! What horrible news. I really hope they find her soon, although since he's been charged i guess the police are pretty sure she wont be found alive. Heartbroken for her poor family and friends.

Tiredmumno1 Sat 06-Oct-12 16:05:34

If they had already charged him, then they wouldn't have been able to interview him anymore. I think they have been hanging it out to try and get him to say where she is, he has probably lied over and over as to the whereabouts of her body sad that would maybe why he has been charged with perverting the course of justice, because he won't be honest angry

Her poor family, and most of all little April, who didn't deserve to have her life taken by an evil monster.

wannaBe Sat 06-Oct-12 16:07:04

it is extremely difficult to secure a conviction without a body.

perverting the course of justice sounds more like trying to bring enough charges to make a conviction stick - most murderers don't disclose the whereabouts of their victims and yet perverting the course of justice isn't a common charge that goes alongside murder.

AlionalovesPan Sat 06-Oct-12 16:09:20

Most murderers don't have a choice about saying where the body is - it's usually in the house, on the street etc.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now