My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

News

passort office erasing mother and father for parent1/2

99 replies

sydneyc · 07/10/2011 11:00

What do other parents think of the passport office changing all passports to show parent one and two instead of mother and father. When they already recognise same sex couples who adopt, who does this law make it easier for.
I am a proud mother of three and i want my passport and my kids passport to reflect that, not show me as parent 1 i am a mother first .
This change apparently is being brought in from lobbying gay rights group surely this is another step too far?

OP posts:
Report
ImpYCelyn · 07/10/2011 11:03

I think it's a great idea actually. Mother and father do have connotations attached to them. DH travelled with DS recently and the passport chap was really aggressive with him, said DS shouldn't be travelling without his mother. I think that's a stupid attitude, but if we were all just parents hopefully we could lose that kind of gender stereotyping.

Report
BarbarianMum · 07/10/2011 11:06

I would be deeply unbothered by this. It' just a piece of paper not a judgment on which/what sort of parent I am.

Report
AMumInScotland · 07/10/2011 11:18

Well, I don't think same sex parents should have to choose which to describe as "mother" and which as "father", so two slots for "parents" sounds fine to me.

There is no fundamental reason why a "mother" is different from a "father" apart from physically giving birth and breastfeeding, which won't have happened with adoptions anyway.

So "parent1" and "parent2" are fine in my view.

Report
CMOTdibbler · 07/10/2011 11:22

Sounds like a perfectly sensible change to me

Report
FearTricksPotter · 07/10/2011 11:23

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

tabulahrasa · 07/10/2011 11:23

I don't have an issue with it - except, how do you decide who gets to be parent 1? Lol

Report
Maisiethemorningsidecat · 07/10/2011 11:24

It doesn't bother me really.

Report
lec0rnsillk · 07/10/2011 11:25

I don't care

Report
TipOfTheSlung · 07/10/2011 11:28

It depends if they change it so that the father (in m/f) always ends up being put as parent 1 or not as seems to happen with so many other applications

Report
StellaAndFries · 07/10/2011 11:29

Doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Report
Bucharest · 07/10/2011 11:34

I think you have too much time on your hands, and are possibly a leeeeetle bit prejudiced about non-nuclear-one-wife-one-husband families.

Report
EllaDee · 07/10/2011 11:39

I think it could be really sensible - my DB and SIL found recently that, where tehy are, you have to nominate one parent as teh person who doesn't need proof from the other parent to travel with a baby. It's dead useful to be able to nominate, say, dad as 'parent 1' in that situation. Maybe this is similar, I don't know?

Report
sydneyc · 07/10/2011 11:43

This is a slow eroding of parental rights bring brought about by the same government who claim to be supporting family values when clearly they are not !

OP posts:
Report
HandDivedScallopsrgreat · 07/10/2011 11:45

Parents don't have rights. They have responsibilities. Children have rights.

HTH

Report
shesparkles · 07/10/2011 11:46

This bugs me, I gave birth to them, I'm their MOTHER.
I'm liberal and tolerant about anything else but why don't I have the right to have the title which is a legal fact, that of mother

Report
sydneyc · 07/10/2011 11:50

I am not prejudiced against non nuclear familes as i was brought up by a single parent but my objection is the erosion of the family, ie mother and father, same sex familes are already recognised by the passport office so why does the goverment feel the need to introduce this change ?, and no i do not have too much time on my hands.
When you are no longer classed as a family and you as a mother /father have no say in anything to do with your children ( extreme example but just imagine) don't complain because you had the choice and decided to sit on the fence.

OP posts:
Report
minervaitalica · 07/10/2011 11:52

Eh? And why would that bother anyone? I am a mother full stop - I do not need a passport to "validate" my position.

Report
sydneyc · 07/10/2011 11:52

thank you shesparkles somebody who actually understands what i am talking about !

OP posts:
Report
PeggyCarter · 07/10/2011 11:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MarginallyNarkyPuffin · 07/10/2011 11:54

You do realise that they are just changing words on paper. They're not actually going to make you get divorced and shack up with an accountant called Sophie from Leamington Spa?

Report
AMumInScotland · 07/10/2011 11:55

I don't see how this erodes anybody's parental rights. It merely changes the labelling, not the authority which either parent has.

Would you expect a same sex couple to have to decide which of them gets called "wife" and which gets called "husband" if they have a civil partnership ceremony? Most people would say it would be inappropriate to force them to label themselves in a way which is based on heterosexuality.

So why should two parents in a same sex couple have to label themselves as the "mother" and "father" of the child(ren)?

Report
BluddyMoFo · 07/10/2011 11:55

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

GypsyMoth · 07/10/2011 11:56

Just because people don't agree with you doesn't mean they don't understand!

Report
PeggyCarter · 07/10/2011 11:56

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

nickelbabe · 07/10/2011 11:57

I think the only way this could become an issue is if they always put the male as the parent 1 (in a m/f family).
They should put as Parent 1 whoever is listed as Parent 1 by the person filling in the form (which would be me in our family and i'm the female)

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.