Thanks for your kind thoughts Solo, and Gravitas for the info about 38 Degrees - public concern brought about many amendments to the Bill.
Scary though it is, I think it's actually going OK due to the amendment process adjusting immoral, flaky, dangerous policy suggestions, and some major U-turns (see Edam above).
As a mum, I do feel they are messing with life and death decisions and there's not enough medical practice reality being discussed. We're not just privatising the railways because no provision means suffering or dying.
Some policy-makers would be more careful if they didn't have private health insurance. What they forget is, insurance will not cover everything and their families will have recourse to the NHS for long-term illness or really difficult stuff and Any Qualified Provider is unlikely to cover that or train their doctors.
Some Qualifed Providers round by us servicing the NHS do a fantastic job with top-speed service, happy docs, and the latest equipment. There will certainly be new attractive medical jobs available.
Re service gaps: when my daughter is 16, our troubles are over. She can:
- personally claim all travel expenses if she wants to continue with the NHS paediatric tertiary service
- be seen in the evenings or weekends NHS by our local adult ophthalmology private provider for either monitoring, triage or treatment, enabling me to go back to work
- qualify for any NHS adult glaucoma or macular degeneration frequent monitoring service (a current target) instead of risking it with long follow-ups
Same for me, Solo. What will happen in the NHS if:
- there's limited local provision for what you've got, or no help finding it
- there's no subsidised travel and accommodation
- different providers compete instead of cooperating, don't share notes
- AQPs don't honour or make subsequent provision for mistakes or failures (which they won't)
- cherrypickers hoover up the funds, teaching hospitals and their outreach clinics are left short of bread-and-butter income
- AQPs are not interested in training, accreditation, formal and informal mentoring
- different providers do not cooperate on complex disorders
- different providers deny knowledge of or liability for shared medical errors
- AQPs deny obligation to treat in difficult cases
- AQP patient notes are no longer shared by medics and accessible to patients by law
- competitive providers cut costs by using sub-standard equipment
- AQP does not refer undiagnosed or tricky cases on to NHS hospital in order to retain income
- AQP only provides part-service for condition and local comprehensive clinic has been withdrawn due to AQP cover
- AQPs servicing NHS have more lax attitude to qualified staff (which I've seen in the private sector)
I really want the NHS pot back in the hands of docs, those who've taken the Hypocratic Oath. A kind, skilled doc with integrity is a beautiful thing and I want them cherished, content and liberated to do their job and follow their professional interests. Not confused, exhausted, overloaded, disillusioned, like now. If they enjoy running their own departments, improving efficiency, keeping their staff happy, as well as treating patients, my joy will be unbounded. Put a compulsory management, staff and systems year in the med training - it's inescapable now.
I also want 24/7 NHS treatment, so this may be forthcoming under the new regime.
Maybe the boom in private health and AQP business
will help subsidise NHS services, free up lists, happier staff, pay for equipment, let's hope.
There is a big
buyer beware component in private practice, no cooperation between disciplines. Maybe this will transfer to AQP business. It's like seeing a quack at the county fair - gone in the morning, NHS picks up the mess.
At the moment DD and I are the poor relations - due to no NHS pot for paediatric eye service, beggars
cannot be choosers.
I just felt I had to put this out there because it's interesting who reads MN! Any comments?