I don't understand the long-term logic of this plan.
Broadly speaking, schools seem to be able to achieve most when they have one or more of the following factors: a good strong visionary and determined Head, able to attract and retain experienced staff, resources (either from foundation or strong PTA or whatever), a core of parents who focus on and support the school and their children's success within it.
If the 'achieving' schools are expanded, will they have the capacity to still be good, if the small size is a factor in it's success?
Once expanded, what if the Head leaves, the govornors collapse and the school goes downhill? (schools do go and up down - a lot).
There will STILL be parents clamouring, unless certain schools are expanded to 15 times their current size!
What happens to the other schools, with a dwindling number of applicants because of expansion of other schools?
It just doesn't make sense to me.
Surely investment in all schools, particularly those in areas which experience complex disadvantage and where the parents can't up sticks on to the doorstep of a favoured school where house prices are hiked up as a result, and there is little social housing available?
If David Cameron gets in, he is going to support the Labour gvt (Blair) in this, in his 'no opposition for opposition's sake' policy.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
Is expanding the most favoured schools the answer?
25 replies
Blu · 25/10/2005 11:14
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.