I posted this in chat originally (shows how much I know about mn - have been on here ages but didn't spot the in the new section!!) but didn't get much response. Now trying here instead.
I'm really fed up about the rumours that SureStart services are going to be cut. Not because I'm a sharp-elbowed middle class parent who might not get an opportunity to use it in future if it does, but because any cuts (and the current rumour is that budgets will be cut by 60%) will affect all sorts of children from all sorts of income groups and quite possibly will hit the most vulnerable hardest.
This article www.independent.co.uk/news/education/schools/cuts- could-mean-sure-start-will-soon-target-only-the-po orest-families-2093404.html explains what I mean best.
I'm feeling all angsty and activisty about it and want to go and picket somewhere about it. Have been to a local SureStart centre today to offer my support if they need some backing at any point, but just wondering how you lot all feel about it.
I accept the 'cuts are needed somewhere and are never popular' argument, but cuts are NOT needed EVERYWHERE. It's about prioritisation. And every child is supposed to matter.
In my area, at least (and I accept it is not true everywhere), the SureStart facilities are very like the ones mentioned in the article (I'm in a different area). Centres are used by a whole mix of people, which I think is a testament to their quality and means that children mix with other kids who they might not ordinarily get to meet - which is surely good for everyone as it 'normalizes' people rather than creating artificial barriers between people from different income brackets. Round here, you don't have to be poor to live in a house without a garden or much play space, so having somewhere different to go, with nice outside play areas and different toys is beneficial even to people on middle incomes. As the article says too, you don't have to be 'poor' to suffer from PND or find having a young child really tough.
OF course services can be improved and 'the most vulnerable' should be where the services are targeted. Centres should have outreach programmes like that described in the article to ensure that the most needy are getting the most benefit. But by cutting the services back, the people who need it most are just as likely to lose out.
I may be middle class and sharp elbowed but I'm really keen to shout loudly to prevent SureStart being cut back, because I don't believe that can happen without impacting vulnerable children - who don't necessarily come from the poorest families in society (although of course these children need at least as much support as anyone else!).
Any ideas what I/we can do about this threat?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
Can we get together to protect SureStart?
18 replies
ReadingTeaLeaves · 07/10/2010 23:06
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.