My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find cleaning advice from other Mumsnetters on our Housekeeping forum.

Housekeeping

Washing machine - which is more economical and/or environmentally friendly?

6 replies

WilLiAmHerschel · 27/09/2016 12:18

Asking mostly out of curiosity... (because my life is that interesting.)

A faster, hotter wash or a longer wash at a lower temperature?

OP posts:
Report
DrDreReturns · 27/09/2016 12:19

I always thought a longer wash at a lower temperature was more economical. I read somewhere that's why modern machines take longer to do a wash.

Report
Cindy34 · 27/09/2016 12:22

A lot are cold feed only now, so I would guess that hot washes are more costly.

The manual will often say which cycles have been rated for efficiency.

Report
NannyR · 27/09/2016 12:27

I think a longer 40 degree is more economical and environmentally sound as it uses less water and less energy as it slowly heats up a smaller amount of water.

Report
PinkSwimGoggles · 27/09/2016 12:29

long and colder (usually) check the manual there should be a section on water and electricity use.

Report
WilLiAmHerschel · 27/09/2016 13:22

Thanks, that's useful to know.

OP posts:
Report
shovetheholly · 28/09/2016 07:54

My 'eco' setting washes cooler for longer. I think there is less shushing around of the clothes too?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.