Advanced search

Washing machine - which is more economical and/or environmentally friendly?

(7 Posts)
WilLiAmHerschel Tue 27-Sep-16 12:18:24

Asking mostly out of curiosity... (because my life is that interesting.)

A faster, hotter wash or a longer wash at a lower temperature?

DrDreReturns Tue 27-Sep-16 12:19:39

I always thought a longer wash at a lower temperature was more economical. I read somewhere that's why modern machines take longer to do a wash.

Cindy34 Tue 27-Sep-16 12:22:34

A lot are cold feed only now, so I would guess that hot washes are more costly.

The manual will often say which cycles have been rated for efficiency.

NannyR Tue 27-Sep-16 12:27:07

I think a longer 40 degree is more economical and environmentally sound as it uses less water and less energy as it slowly heats up a smaller amount of water.

PinkSwimGoggles Tue 27-Sep-16 12:29:43

long and colder (usually) check the manual there should be a section on water and electricity use.

WilLiAmHerschel Tue 27-Sep-16 13:22:55

Thanks, that's useful to know.

shovetheholly Wed 28-Sep-16 07:54:46

My 'eco' setting washes cooler for longer. I think there is less shushing around of the clothes too?

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now