”liaising with the ‘bean counters’ who want to strip your design of anything ‘frivolous’ to keep down costs, thereby diluting your ideas and compromising the design.”
- what a twatty attitude and the kind that contributes to negative attitudes generally towards architects and interior designers. My mum was a professional interior designer working in industry, the commercial sector and the occasional private castle. She did a 2 year course after 1 year studying fine art, all at Sunderland Art College, but this is way back.
Delivering the best possible design but
within budget was the objective, it’s the client’s bloody money. If you want to indulge your “vision” without vulgar budget constraints, then fund it yourself.
My mum said she often saved client’s money by catching architects mistakes and righting them. When I worked in a construction related industry I saw it too, silly things like architects specifying a finished size on timber that corresponded to the nominal standard sizes. Finished sawn wood is 4mm smaller than the nominal size. So if it went unquestioned and uncorrected, the end client would end up paying massive special sawing and wastage costs for bespoke sizes on the carcassing timber throughout their house, just because the architect confused nominal and finished sizes and didn’t know enough about the materials.
Part of the job of an architect or interior designer is knowing materials, trades, standard sizes, finishes, and designing around them to minimise costs except where the aesthetic or functional benefit outweighs the additional cost.
It’s a very satisfying job but much more technical than many realise. It’s not just wafting about with swatches.