My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Mumsnet doesn't verify the qualifications of users. If you have medical concerns, please consult a healthcare professional.

General health

MMR Debate on Horizon

61 replies

egypt · 29/05/2005 22:06

Just wondered if anyone saw this? DH and I are now concerned about dd having it - after being totally happy with the idea before! Anyone considering the single vaccines? Wondered if anyone knows about any disadvantages to this and how it is done (timescale etc).

Thanks

OP posts:
Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:07

Egypt, sooooo much about this on the archives on Mumsnet. And check out www.jabs.org.uk, v helpful...

Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:10

thanks dinny, yes i bet there is loads. will check it all out when i have time to. having a look at the website now.. thanks

OP posts:
Report
Stargazer · 29/05/2005 22:12

Egypt - why???? According to all the research (apart from Wakefield) there is no link between MMR and autism. Both my DS and DD have had the MMR vaccine.

Ultimately, it's your decision, but if you opt for single injections - do ensure that you complete the whole course - many parents don't.

Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:12

my dd had single measles and mumps at the Breakspear Hospital in Hemel Hempstead. They were great.

Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:13

Many parents choose not to complete the course, Stargazer.

Report
Gobbledigook · 29/05/2005 22:14

What's your concern? There is no link.

Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:15

Why not opt for single vax?

Report
Stargazer · 29/05/2005 22:16

But Dinny - that's exactly the problem with single jabs. You don't have full protection for your child or other people's children.

Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:19

She has the protection I want her to have.

Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:23

i would most certainly complete the course, without a doubt, but i just have this feeling of unease watching those mothers who, even after seeing the stats, KNOW in their minds the the mmr caused their child's autism. it's stupid i know i know i know, but just wondered whether there could be any disadvantage to the single vaccines then weigh up the situation.

OP posts:
Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:24

so why would the single vaccines not give you the protection to others children? is it the period in between the jabs that leaves others open to infection?

OP posts:
Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:25

......as well as our our own children?

OP posts:
Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:26

I'm not giving dd rubella until she's older, fwiw, Egypt. was just going to give her measles (as at nursery) then dh persuaded me she should have mumps top. some people don't vaccinate at all, shock horror

Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:27

no, i'm being paranoid. there is no link, you are right. hmmmmm. i'll perhaps let this thread continue and take a look in the morning.

OP posts:
Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:27

my cousin has never vaccinated any of her 4 girls for anything.

OP posts:
Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:28

why not dinny?

OP posts:
Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:29

it's because MMR is much more economically viable for DOH than single jabs, Egypt.

Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:29

no i mean why are you not giving her rubella?

OP posts:
Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:31

will probably when she is older. will be shot down for saying this but I'm not jabbing my daughter for the common good.

Report
egypt · 29/05/2005 22:32

it's your choice. just makes me mad when people dont vaccinate and then others suffer through it. is that why you mean by 'the common good?'

OP posts:
Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:34

re rubella - don't really see why a toddler should be vaxed against it. would prefer to wait till when I had it (12)

Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:35

but yes, tbh I had dd vaxed to protect her, not really with public health as a whole in mind.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

egypt · 29/05/2005 22:37

tbh i never gave a thought to public health when considering the dtp but after watching horizon i am now. guess rubella isnt necessary until 12. is it?

OP posts:
Report
dinny · 29/05/2005 22:38

well, not for the child, but is obviously a problem if said child gets rubella and infects an pg woman with no immunity...

Report
Jimjams · 29/05/2005 23:11

there are people on mumsnet whose children regressed following the MMR - try telling them there's no link.

Hey hang on if we don't bother looking for it we won't find any link will we. No no no we don;t need to look at affected children- lets just churn out some numbers- they'll never pick it up if only 7% of cases of autism are caused in this way (best guess at the moment) and so everyone's happy. except for the collateral damage (soorry did I say collateral damage I meant affected children) of course, but never mind them eh.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.