My feed
Premium
Please
or
to access all these features

Related: TV discussion forum.

Films

Peter rabbit

80 replies

allthegoodnameshadgone · 17/03/2018 20:20

I saw this today and I thought it was great. I even had a little cry in parts. Anyone else seen it yet?

OP posts:
Report
GaraMedouar · 17/03/2018 20:26

Saw it yesterday with DD - really enjoyed it , laughed out loud at times . I didn’t actually cry at all , which is unlike me. Sat behind the most enormous person in the cinema though Grin - had to be me! Well actually it was DD but I swapped with her.

Report
GaraMedouar · 17/03/2018 20:28

I mean that I swapped with DD so she got a perfect view , not the other way round! I’m a nice mum really.

Report
allthegoodnameshadgone · 17/03/2018 20:56

I took my nephew. He's as tall as peter crouch. I had to swap seats with him as the little girl behind couldn't see over his head! There were no seats at the back where I normally sit with him.

I am a crier. As I get older I jut get more emotsh.

OP posts:
Report
ListeningtoBowie · 17/03/2018 21:03

I enjoyed the film and thought it was good but I have to say it wasn't really anything to do with the real Peter Rabbit. Where were all the characters? Mr Todd barely even featured.
I didn't really like the music in it.
I do think Beatrix potter would be turning in her grave though.

Report
GaraMedouar · 17/03/2018 21:16

Yes it wasn’t the ‘real ‘ Peter Rabbit as such but did find it a good film. Though not one that I’d rush to see again.

Report
Monny1 · 18/03/2018 17:12

I haven't seen the film, but l have heard about the scene, where, l think Peter Rabbit throws blackberries at the farmer and he has anaphylaxtic reaction and has to use an epipen. I have children and my friends have children with life threatening allergies and dont find this particular amusing. How did it come across in the film? I told my children about it and they didn't think it was a nice thing to do. As l said l haven't seen the film and l would be interested in your views.

Report
Snoreyhell · 18/03/2018 17:14

It looks a bit aggressive on the trailers I've seen. My 3 year old loves Peter Rabbit but they've not really made it suitable for young children.

Report
GaraMedouar · 18/03/2018 18:13

@Monny1 - the blackberry incident - it was Flopsy or Mopsy who catapulted it into his throat because he had an allergy, on purpose. They were trying to kill him I think as the man was actively trying to kill the rabbits. (The old Mr McGregor had killed Peter Rabbit’s father and cooked him in a pie - so yes, gruesome I suppose, and not hidden.) However , he used his epipen and survived.
I have a life threatening allergy, and my DS does too with epipen. I went with my DD who doesn’t have an allergy but knows her brother and I do, and I discussed that scene and spoke about the epipen and when it should be used with allergies so it was a discussion and she learnt a bit more about our allergies from it.
It also had electrocution too, where people grabbed electrified fence and shot across the room. Fairly Tom and Jerry ish I suppose, which is in fact quite violent. DD is 7 and was fine.

Report
KittenBeast · 18/03/2018 18:15

Saw it today with my 5 year old, it's not had very good reviews but I really quite enjoyed it!

Report
Psychobabble123 · 18/03/2018 18:17

It looks a bit aggressive on the trailers I've seen. My 3 year old loves Peter Rabbit but they've not really made it suitable for young children Good grief!! Confused

Report
Iamagreyhoundhearmeroar · 18/03/2018 18:21

A film about Peter Rabbit, not suitable for young children Confused
Tbh, when I heard James Corden had voiced Peter, I knew there's no way I could sit through it. Why him?

Report
Justabadwife · 18/03/2018 18:24

I really want to watch it. They filmed some of it in the village where I live so I want to see how that looks 😊

Report
Lastoftheusernames · 18/03/2018 18:26

It's also a film about Peter Rabbit mostly filmed in Australia, featuring mostly Australian actors. When it's not Australia pretending to be the Lakes, it's London. Ambleside features for a few minutes only.

Report
Snoreyhell · 18/03/2018 23:46

Well for a start it's rated PG! Why not U given it's likely audience?

Report
Snoreyhell · 18/03/2018 23:47

*Its

iPhone autocorrect...

Report
KittenBeast · 19/03/2018 12:37

Snoreyhell - it's a little upsetting when Peter's dad gets whacked to death by Mr McGregor and then his missus presents a pie to him Sad even I nearly cried! Blush

Report
Littlelambpeep · 19/03/2018 12:40

I thought it was great. even dh liked it. I do agree, they could have left the blackberry scene out though

Report
Snoreyhell · 19/03/2018 19:48

Honestly, I think my 3 year old would be upset by that! Such a shame they didn't aim it at its natural audience- i.e. 3 year olds!!

Report
Honeybooboo123 · 19/03/2018 23:58

My 4 and 8 year olds loved it.
I loved the General Hux takes up gardening vibe while wearing really good jeans.

Report
Psychobabble123 · 20/03/2018 06:55

I don't know any 3 year olds who would have been even remotely upset by that Confused

Report
Snoreyhell · 20/03/2018 17:25

Makes you wonder why they made it a PG then Psycho doesn't it, if all 3 year olds should be ok with it.

Report
Psychobabble123 · 20/03/2018 18:12

Probably to protect themselves from pearl-clutching parents, I should think Snorey.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

sillyoldowl · 20/03/2018 18:21

My two year old loved it as did my seven year old myself and dh

Report
Snoreyhell · 20/03/2018 20:56

They adhere to guidelines about what constitutes a PG psycho that has nothing to do with the clutching of pearls.

Report
KittenBeast · 20/03/2018 21:01

Psycho - I liked it, my 5 year old liked it, we both were upset when the rabbit got bludgeoned to death, does that make us pearl clutchy?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.