A colleague and I both do the same job, have been with our company for the same amount of time, and are the same seniority. We are both on contractual 3-month notice periods.
He gave notice recently and was only required to work three weeks of his notice. Two weeks later, I gave notice as well, and my employer is making me work all three months of my notice. Their reason is 'because of all of the upheaval caused by (other colleague) leaving we need stability'.
I'm a bit 'Say whaaaa?' about the whole thing. My colleague feels awful about this, bless him. I've officially written in my resignation letter to request my last day is six weeks from now as I know there is an internal candidate who can act as a caretaker until someone permanent is recruited. When I mentioned this in my face-to-face, my boss didn't agree that this person could act up in the role which is complete BS as he did this role at his last job very successfully and really wants to do the same role at our current company. But she's not hearing it and doesn't agree.
Do I have absolutely any leg to stand on in requesting a reduction in my notice period (I do have an actual good reason for wanting to leave earlier, I'm not just being a pill) because of the very short notice period granted to my colleague? I have asked but it's been very 'computer says no'.
It's always the notice periods, isn't it?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.
Work
He gets to leave in 3 weeks, but they're making me stay 3 months?
13 replies
mowmylawn · 27/09/2016 22:25
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.