Leaving a job before notice period expires.... can it be done?(42 Posts)
My DH has been offered a (dream) job. He was just about to send his notice to his boss and was checking something on his HR website and had found that his role has a 3 month period of notice.... clearly he signed something at some point about this. He was promoted a level this time last year for which he signed another contract (which is most likely when it happened - yes I know he should have checked) other wise it could have happened a few weeks ago when he was promoted to Director (nothing new signed for this was a name change only)
So here is the problem, his new job NEEDS to start in 6/7 weeks. He will have about 2 weeks accrued holiday so wtf are we going to do???? He is in a high profile position and I know they are not going to want him there under sufferance but his Boss is
an asshole a bit petty and would, I suspect love nothing more than to make things very difficult...
Could he ask for unpaid leave? What would you do in this situation? Can they sue him personally for breach of contract?
Any help or advice would be appreciated
There are no restrictions on the type of work, they do not have competitors as a such, they are a public interest body. He has work for them for 7 years I think with excellent service. I am really hoping that they will be good about it. My Dh is an honourable sort and will do all he can to make the transition smooth.
And seriously I know he should have read the contract, his original contract was 6 weeks and he has been promoted several times and hence he didn't think to read it! Daft I know but he just didn't feel the need!!!
I think they would rather have him helpful and cooperative for 6 weeks than force him to stay.
I know what its like as I've recently had someone in my office who hadn't realised that they had a 3 month notice period as well, so i know does happen. Luckily I work for a fantastic company so was able to sort out an agreed period that suited everyone.
Although it already looks like he's done this, but just in case he hasn't, can your DH think of any excuses at his boss may come up with to ensure that he serves his full notice and pre-empt them with workable solutions. Is there someone in-house that can competently full his shoes, if he honestly feels that this could be an issue then this in particular could be a stumbling block as they would genuinely need to go through a recruiting process themselves.
It is a hard situation as his boss doesn't have to be the good guy here but finger's crossed that he if does play the full contractual card that the other company will wait. Also, within his company, is this decision made solely by his boss or would it be made together with HR, and othervsenior management, if the latter then he ma have the chance of getting support from others who recognise his great service.
nextphaseMon 29-Apr-13 20:13:26
"Flowery is the HR expert, so whatever she says is correct, but I'd have thought gardening leave, unpaid leave, or anything else that means he is technically still employed by his current employer could be a problem. He needs early release, surely, so that his contract ends, and he is free to start a contract with the new company?"
OP they can't have increased his notice period automatically, he would have had to been notified and either signed something or at the very least had the opportunity to object to the proposed change.
Agreed that he must have signed something as this was on the HR system when he logged on. I think he just didn't check each time he signed!
dimwit I think he will be checking his new contract with the other company very very carefully.
He either needs to be completely straight with them or play it dead cool... not sure which he should do.
And honestly, whilst technically it is breach of contract to start another job whilst on gardening leave, who would really sue for that? what grounds would they have if it did not detract from their business?
Depending on the company, yes they could definitely sue and it would be on the grounds that he had breached his contract with them, they don't need any other reason. This could wreck his reputation within the industry, and why would any other company want to hire someone who appears to want to pick and chooses what clauses in his contract he fulfils.
I know that I would not look favourably upon any employee who joined another company whilst employed just because the terms of his current contract contact didn't suit at that moment.
Also, if his new company found out that he had signed their employment contract whilst being fully aware that he was still contractually bound by another company, then this could be grounds for instant dismissal.
I realise that this is frustrating for you, but there are many good reasons that companies need to put longer notice periods for more senior or tenured people.
The other offer may not be as black and white as they are making out, your DH needs to explore all options with both companies whilst realising that there is a chance that he may be put on gardening leave.
I just cannot understand why a company would bother to go to all that bother though - what would they have to gain? For the sake of another 6 weeks (minus hols), I cannot imagine anyone could be bothered. I am not trying to be contentious I just don't get it. His company is not going to lose money and actually the publicity for them would not be good either...
Anyway, he is going to take the nicely route and see where it gets him. There is another Director who could be an ally for him as they have been there a long time too - the person who is his direct
asshole boss has not been there long.
I suppose what they have to gain is to give the message that they take their contracts seriously, if they let one employer breach their contract then there is little to stop others doing the same.
OP, it doesn't really matter whether you "get" why they would sue or not. The fact is, they can, and they might. The publicity from it is not going to reach the front page of the Daily Mail but within the industry it could actually send out a message that they will not break contractual terms and sends a very clear message to their own employees that they are not to be messed with, either on length of notice or ignoring gardening leave restrictions.
I know the new company apparently needs someone in about 6 weeks but if they are recruiting at director level, notice periods of 3 months upwards are totally the norm so they must have been expecting to have to wait for any appointed candidate. It is a bit embarrassing however for your husband to have to go back and tell them he didn't know his own contractual terms.
And find that contract!!!!
"I just cannot understand why a company would bother to go to all that bother though"
For some employers it will be a principle and sending a message.
Some will incur a financial loss as a result of the breach and will want to recover it.
Some react badly to a resignation and want to make a point. I note you say your DH's boss is petty...
They wouldn't necessarily take it as far as actually suing him of course, but unpleasant letters can be exchanged and reputations can be seriously damaged, which is the thing I'd be most concerned about.
You mention above the options are being straight with them or "playing it dead cool". I'm not sure what "playing it dead cool" means, but I would urge him to be straight with his employers, be cooperative and hope they release him early.
Sorry, OP. Hijack.
Flowery: I've seen you on a number of threads, and your always lovely, and seem to have accurate advice. or for all your help to everyone here.
Flowery - glad to see you being appreciated. I see there's been a few threads recently where you have put effort into giving advice and the OP has never come back.
Ok, amazing update. My DH spoke to them and they are going to let him go........... Thank you for all your advice, it was so helpful and he approached them with an offer of what he would do in the time he has left. His horrid boos is making out he could stop him if he wants but DH is on good terms with HR and they said they will give him his references and let him go without a fight. They are not happy about it but they also know keeping someone there under sufferance is a bad idea. they need him to cooperate to get someone new and dot he hand over.
Thank goodness we are in the home stretch
Good news OP.
With regard to Flowery's point above about some employers suing employees who don't respect their notice period....my previous place of employment did just that, and I was the lawyer who advised them.
We had a temp who was on a 4 week notice period who left us in the lurch - just walked out and made life v v v difficult. Her manager was FUMING. We sued her to make a point - we claimed about £500 and the costs of doing so were about £30. She got a CCJ against her. Yes it was a nasty thing to do, but equally she had no respect for her job / her work or the absolute mess she left behind. Lots more to the story, but just to make the point that some people do get sued, and thinking, I'll get away with it and they won't bother suing little me, doesn't always wash.
No one else tried it on!
Pleased you got a good result OP, hope DH's new job goes well.
No they wont sue him ,that much is clear. They are (as they should be) going to be dignified about it and part company on good terms as he has been there a long time and is well respected. This company tend not to pursue people through the courts because they like to protect their image (thank goodness for us) and Dh is doing forward planning for them and advising them in return for them releasing him early.
Six weeks is plenty long enough to hand over effectively and Dh feels that he is not leaving them in the lurch by any means. Honestly if the horrible boos had been a bit more decent about things he wouldn't have wanted to leave anyway. Thankfully HR are very much on his side and effectively said, we will not stand in your way, we understand and we willhappily give you references and certainly not sue you!!!!
Join the discussion
Please login first.