From today's Times. To send your son to Eton for one year only where his brother went and then remove him kind of breaks your pact with him, better not to start than start and then fail.
"Expensive private education? Think again
No wonder demand for state school places is soaring. Many of us can no longer pay big bucks
Heather McGregor
Recommend? (149)
Where do your children go to school?? I am frequently asked. It might be the social niceties of a business lunch, or the surroundings of a wedding reception. Do they want to check that you are in their league? Or do they want to make sure that you are doing that uniquely British thing ? spending every last penny you possess (and many that you don?t) on putting your children through the very best education you can obtain for them?
It is a British thing. The French, for instance, cannot fathom why we pay so much for private secondary schools. In Australia, where the Government gives private schools a subsidy for every child they spare the state having to educate, they wonder at the prices the British will pay for a private education. And the Americans find the concept ever so slightly mad.
We used to be one of those slightly mad families. For years we paid for our three children to attend the very best of Britain?s private schools. We never considered doing anything else; we had both been educated privately and wanted for our children what had been provided for us.
But then the recession arrived, and we had to face the truth; we are not Goldman Sachs partners nor in possession of trust funds set up by munificent grandparents to pay for school fees. Our eldest son was about to start university. But the other two were being educated out of current income. Running a small business in a recession does not yield a lot of cash.
BACKGROUND
* Crisis in primary school places causes councils to cut back other services
* Demand for state school places soars
* Troubled teenagers? You?re to blame
* Charity Begins at School
The prospect of using up what savings we had, and/or borrowing money, made us stop and think: why are we doing this? Will these children really be that much worse off in the state sector? We had looked at several private schools for our sons and chosen one that we thought would provide our children not only with an education, but wider skills and a network ? membership of a club.
Now we had to challenge our long-held beliefs and go and see what choice was available to us; we were very pleasantly surprised. For secondary education we had a boys-only option, our closest state school, and, almost equidistant, a co-educational comprehensive with a very helpful and supportive headmaster who found another previously privately educated child to show us around. And if we were prepared to venture a little farther there was an 11-16 co-ed cited by Ofsted this year as having ?an outstanding quality of education?.
There was also the local private day school, which does not usually admit pupils at 14+, and whose 13+ place we had turned down a while ago in preference for one at one of the grandest public schools in the country. A letter explaining frankly why we had previously spurned them, and why we would be grateful for a further discussion, persuaded them to re-interview and re-examine our son. For £4,500 a term (as opposed to almost £12,000) he now has a place at a school that sends almost a third of its pupils to Oxbridge each year, where the parents are more likely to be our peers, and where he will make local friends rather than ones who live in Moscow or have a second home in Barbados.
The ten-year-old is returning to the local village primary school after a three-year absence; again, a truthful letter to the new headmistress paved the way.
The boys have been brilliant; the younger one is thrilled to be coming home from boarding school, and the older one, while very disappointed at leaving new friends and a school where he was extremely happy, recognises that as a family we will all be better prepared financially if he moves.
We will need to adjust our lives to do more hands-on parenting; that too is no bad thing. They have probably lost their ?club membership?; we shall have to compensate. The process has been cathartic, and while we acknowledge that others may not have such high-quality options as we do in Oxfordshire, I would still encourage anyone facing financial challenges to consider something they may previously have considered heresy.
How will it turn out? I have no idea, but I would cite two people who have contacted me since I made our decision public. The first was a banker, whom I know. ?I?ve always regarded private secondary education as absurdly expensive and, thank God, managed to put my two children through the grammar school system.? He did, however, pay for one of them, who had good GCSE grades, to do her A levels in the private sector. ?Just as I expected, this ended up as simply being an expensive private members? club and her results would have been just the same . . .?
The other is someone I had never met, a young man in his early twenties. His parents had done the same to him ? removed him from one of the country?s grandest establishments and sent him to the local (and very much cheaper) private day school. ?I won?t pretend the transition was all that easy. It was very difficult having my parents involved in my day-to-day education ... But I made new and good friends (who lived around the corner, rather than in Paris, New York etc) and found that I really enjoyed the additional freedom I got from going to a day school. I got my As and went to Durham.?
He signed off his e-mail with the reassuring ?It?ll be fine.? And do you know what? I suspect it will be. Contrary to long-held beliefs, private education, and especially the most expensive kind, is not necessarily the only option. The psychological barrier for us was, I suspect, much harder than the real one is going to be.
Heather McGregor is managing director of an executive search company