I know life isn't fair (!!) but it seems strange that a child should get a completely different state education system depending on where he/she is born in the UK.
Is it correct that grammar schools have a higher budget per child than comprehensives? Surely the same amount should be spent per child whatever state secondary school he/she is in? If there are reasons to keep grammars in some counties why aren't grammars brought back everywhere? If the grammar school system is flawed (due to some children maturing later academically or whatever) why are grammar schools still in existance?
I don't know all the arguments for or against grammars or have a particular opinion as to whether they are the best system (I have never lived in a county that has grammars).
I just think that we pay the same level of tax uk wide so why not have the same standard of education nationwide - preferably improved everywhere. I think the postcode lottery of the NHS is bonkers too.
looking forward to lots of objective replies!!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Join the discussion on our Education forum.
Education
why don't we either have grammars everywhere or abolish them?
74 replies
katebee · 15/07/2008 21:23
OP posts:
StarlightMcKenzie ·
15/07/2008 21:24
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.