Educational Advantage from NCT classes(6 Posts)
This from the TES:
I didn't go to NCT antenatal but did go on a post-natal course. It was great and yes, decidedly middle-class but I don't really think it had any educational benefits for DD. What do other people think?
I've just read the article here .
I think the link to educational advantage of NCT is misleading. The article is really claiming that the perceived educational benefits (see middle paragraph) are generated by the behaviour and mindset of a particular type of peer network (middle class parents), but that NCT is promoting or entrenching this because the network is really the key benefit that most people get from NCT. It implies that if you can't afford NCT you won't have access to this network and therefore your children could be at an educational disadvantage from birth, but this shouldn't be the ethos of a "national" charity which only subsidises a fraction of placements and as a consequence of cost is only available to those who can afford it. Basically you're buying your friends.
The concept of antenatal peer groups has been around for decades and in itself is not limited to middle classes. Plenty of courses are provided on the NHS and through local organisations but it's true NCT has found itself occupying a very specific demographic space. I think that even without NCT many people in this demographic would be inclined to form their own peer groups and the same behaviours wouls result.
The point would be better made if the author had written the article from the point of view of a national charity having the responsibility to bridge a class gap through shared experiences of events such as childbirth. I think this would be a point well made but you would still see groups or sub-groups being formed between people who felt they had commonality between them for whatever reason. Think baby classes - anyone can attend them, but you mostly tend to develop and foster friendships with people you identify with.
Frankly the success of your group depends on its members though as it does with any. I'm definitely one of the middle class parent types that the author refers to but I would have been looking into "development, local educational opportunities, kids books and exercises" regardless of NCT. I just found it was (mostly) nice to have a like minded group of people to talk about that with and I would have found them somewhere else if it hadn't been for NCT. I also enjoy the same conversations with anyone from any background and don't believe they're limited to middle classes, hence the reason I'm on MN.
Completely agree with fruit boxes excellent post
Thank you trainspotting, I really appreciate that
They should read the Freakanomics chapter which looks at the difference between correlation and cause, and whether it is what parents DO or ARE that makes the difference.
So, quite clearly it isn't the NCT itself that leads to higher achiemevemnt (cause) but the kind of people who join it (correlation) that results in higher achievement. Typically middle class people who are interested in education and who consequently do the things that result in higher achievement join. So the people who join also are those who read to their babies, sing to them etc. It's the people not the organisation that have the effect.
Yes the NCT needs to and does work hard to broaden access.....but it was suddenly successful in attracting those from deprived backgrounds, the make up would be different and that would mean that there would be seemingly less connection between nct memebership and do educational achievement, because whilst the NCT connections might broaden some parents understanding of things they can do which improve attainment, essentially, those outcomes come from who you are, which determines what you do, rather than the other way round.
Join the discussion
Please login first.