Who feels their own education was damaged by the holidays they had in term time?(106 Posts)
Judging by the strength of opinion on MN, there must be loads of you.
We often had time out of school to go abroad. Especially as dad went on frequent business trips and if it was anywhere intresting we would all go along.l No problem with getting the time off school and all had a decent education and career.
Have done exactly the same with my dc. No problems thus far with gaining good A levels and GCSE's or Uni offers.
Mountain out of a mole hll all this fining and stuff.
The only thing I would say is we never expect the teacher to explain anything missed, nor would we ever ask for them to set work whilst we are away. That would be down to us.
Myself and older brother had 100% attendance up until the later years of high school when our mother became poorly, but we couldn't afford holidays therefore never did holidays. Younger sister and brother however had some time off for what we saw as ridiculous reasons, again no holidays, and both now in their 20's can barely read and struggle with maths etc.
I know it's not the same but it does go to show that big chunks of missed learning can/does affect some DC.
Adults have a different view, to them the end of term is a waste of time- sometimes you need to look at things from the eyes of a child.
I've never taken my children out at the end of term, it's the best week!!!
I don't think it should be a blanket everyone has that week off but I do agree with other posters that the flexibility that seemed to be there would be good
For the children the end of terms are fun, and not a time they would want to be out.
I know what you mean about the last week of term, but don't you think that holiday companies and airlines would cotton on pretty quickly and put the prices up at those times if everyone started being allowed to take their dc out then?
Although I see your point about tbe cost fluter.
You can experience other cultures in the holidays though so it's not really that you are providing a better education than those who send their children to school for the whole year.
do you think there should be no rule at all
I do think there should be rules and guidelines, but there should be more room for the discretion and judgement of the headteacher than there is with the current rules - i.e. more like it used to be.
We never were taken out in term time. But I feel so sad my dc will probably never go abroad until they finish school at 16/18. Because the prices are so high I can't imagine us ever being able to afford it in school holidays. I think that is really detrimental to them. It's especially annoying when all they do is watch films and faff about in the last week of term.
We were taken out for 3 weeks every June in primary and never missed anything. I think for under 12's it's far more important to experience other cultures than be at school. I have taken mine out at least once a year and will continue to to so. School targets are not my concern, my children's experiences are!
holmes just seen your question
I have never and would never take my children out for longer than a week in primary school. In senior school it would depend on the circumstances of the holiday to be honest, it's not something I would do as a matter of course
If there was to be rules I would say that no more than a week and at a suitable time, for example the last week of the summer term. I don't yo be honest know that many people who take their children out of school
Didn't go on holiday in term time as far as I can remember
Went on holidays abroad once every two years from 12 until 18 so 4 times!
Have taken my children out of school for holidays while they were in primary school
Ds1 is now in year 10 and I have only taken him out of school for three days, that was in year 9 and there are no plans to take him out again
Dd and ds2 may miss a week of school next October (2015) haven't decided yet
I was never taken out for a holiday- my parents wouldn't have even considered it.
I missed an entire termand a half of year 8 (due to bullying - I wish I'd been on holiday!) and didn't do any catch up work (I was never sent any) and no-one home educated me either.
In the long term it never made any difference. I got 10 GCSEs all with grades ranging from A* to B.
Those of you who think it's fine to take your dc on holiday in term time, do you think there should be no rule at all - I.e. anyone could take their dc out of school any time in the year for a holiday? For as long as they like? If not, what would the rule be? Every child allowed two weeks out each year? So you would most likely never have a class without a bunch of absentees who need to be caught up by the teacher afterwards. A bit chaotic.
There are 190 teaching days in a school year, aren't there? So 15% is 28.5 days.
A week is about 2.5%, a fortnight is 5.25%. (I rounded to the nearest 0.25, hence the slight difference - and if I'm wrong about the 190 days, then I'm talking even more rubbish than usual anyway.)
I'd have thought for someone to miss 15%, they'd either have to be badly ill, to go overseas to see family or something for an extended time, or to be a serial truanter. Probably not that many are also in the same group of people who also take a week out for termtime holidays, I would have thought. (But I may be totally wrong.)
I was an army brat and moved around constantly - 8 schools altogether. I did ok, not as well as I could have done but I firmly put that down to a total lack of support or concern from parents. Never asked about homework or offered to help as far as they were concerned it was completely the schools concern and nothing to do with them. They had no understanding of them actually having a part to play.
I just do not agree that before GCSE years that the occasional holiday effects anything in the long term and as such I take dd out for a fortnight each year. Sometimes the whole lot in one go or two one weekers.
I am actually really about the strength of opinion against it on here tbh, I have never come across that in RL.
Sorry, I may need to correct myself here.
The government report states:
"Latest figures show that almost 400,000 pupils miss 15% of schooling a year - the equivalent of having a month off school."
So if a month is 15% - a fortnight would be about 7.5% and a week would be about 3-4%. Is this how they've defined it...?
Have you read the report in full? Those statistics you were quoting - if you go down and read the chart, it breaks down into the type of absence, and shows that children who have up to 4% absence over key stage 4 due to holidays actually get better results than those students who have 100% attendance.
Well, that's that then. From now on, my children are always going to have a term time holiday, so I can improve their results .
Hmm, a couple of things about that report -
Firstly, it is a report, produced by the government, who clearly have an agenda against term time holidays. This is NOT independent, peer reviewed research on the matter. Please do not be fooled into thinking it is.
Secondly, Why does it not cover those that have between 5 and 10% off school a year. Why does the figure go from less than 5% to more than 10%?
To take a week's holiday term time is 5%, given that the 10% mark is usually accepted as 10 school days.
So from this, shall we conclude that to take a week's holiday has no negative effect whatsoever...? (And yes, that is the general consensus of most research out there!)
All the parents at my (1970s state) primary school were teachers, doctors or lawyers. It was just that kind of neighbourhood.
Perfectly normal for kids in my school to take 1-2 wks holidays in term time every yr.
Thus I conclude that teachers-doctors-lawyers are obviously not in the Naice MC.
So, er, Who is Naice MC?
OK I haven't found the research I referred to yet but this report is interesting.
I draw your attention to the 3 bullet points on the first page.
35% of children get 5 or more GCSE's if they miss 10-20% of school.
73% of children missing less than 5% of school get 5 or more GCSE
There are 195 school days in the year so 10% is only 19.5 days. 5% is 9.75 days, so as little as extra 10 days or so out of school could halve your chances of getting 5 or more GCSE's. 2 week holiday can do a lot of damage.
The fact that some of you were in the 35% who did get their qualifications and went on to bigger and better things doesn't really help those for whom those extra days did a lot of damage.
The supportive parents thing is a bit of red herring. Naice MC parents wouldn't take their children out of school, not in my experience. It is those on lower incomes who can't afford school holiday prices who are happy to take their children out of school even though it goes again the rules. Supportive parents tend to want their children to be in school as much as possible to get the best education they can and to follow the school rules.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.