My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.

Childbirth

Was the 2nd birth quicker and easier?

43 replies

sleepfinder · 20/07/2007 15:22

I've not been on here for ages after a battle over bananas on the weaning threads...

Got DS 10 months and Baby 2 due this coming November.

Have been told Number 2 quicker, easier, less painful (!?!) than first.

Certainly the pregnancy is less of a body shock, but does everyone find this?

OP posts:
Report
notasheep · 20/07/2007 15:26

Number 2 was 10days late and induced UGH!!!

where as Number 1 was 4 days early

So you never know when baby will arrive.
Wishing you well

Report
LoonyLyraLovegood · 20/07/2007 15:27

No. Second much worse.

Report
lulumama · 20/07/2007 15:28

first birth here was a failed induction , ending in c.s

second birth was spontanous labour, ending in normal, intervention free vaginal birth

so much better here !

Report
sleepfinder · 20/07/2007 15:29

How worse LLL? Longer, more painful, please feel free to elaborate...

OP posts:
Report
bellaprincess · 20/07/2007 15:31

1st birth took ages as I had an epideral. My 2nd birth I decided to do natural and I gave birth within 45mins of entering the hospital. I was told by midwife if you can try and wait as long as possible at home because hospitals tend slow down labour in the early contractions (something to do with white coat syndrome - didn't understand much but it helped).

Report
Ceolas · 20/07/2007 15:32

Second was much easier for me, but you'll get loads of different responses on this one! Don't think there's a definite rule.

Report
quiveutmabonnebaguette · 20/07/2007 15:32

1rst birth - 35 hours of labour (1rst stage very long)

2nd birth (Homebirth) - 4 hours, yes easier as you know what to expect, the bit that really hurt (and difficult) was the pushing.

Report
LoonyLyraLovegood · 20/07/2007 15:33

Much longer, much more painful, ended in ventouse delivery and shocked DS2 going to special care for a few hours with very low apgar scores.
But then my case is different in that the first birth was an emergency CS after 12 hours' labour and DS1 becoming distressed.
If you had a vaginal birth first time round, you can expect the second to be quicker and easier.

Report
runawayquickly · 20/07/2007 15:33

First: went in on Weds, had DS on Saturday. Felt like a medical problem that had to be SOLVED. HAd every drug on the planet and was climbing the walls with pain.

Second: At home in pool, just gas and air, 12 hours. Laughed all the way through (that gas is fab.) Not much pain. Cup of tea 20 mins later and back to my own bed. Aaaaaah.

Report
Quattrocento · 20/07/2007 15:35

My second pregnancy was harder but then I was older

But my second labour was a breeze. Think that's the general rule, isn't it? Unless you are unlucky enough to be an exception to the rule of course ...

Report
sleepfinder · 20/07/2007 15:35

Ok,these are really helpful, thanks. 1st birth was vaginal, no assistance other than drugs - mobile epidural.

It hurt like holy buggery and I fully expect that part to remain the same...

OP posts:
Report
whywhywhy · 20/07/2007 15:46

yes, quicker at least.

But I would say first was actually less painful. 7 hours, only really painful bit was transition.

DS2 2/3 hours, last hour was agony and I would have begged for gas and air if I could have spoken!! And the afterpains were awful. But he did shoot out, bless him.

2nd pregnancy was worse too, I was more sick and absolutely vast.

Report
lulumama · 20/07/2007 15:47

sleepfinder

the pain might be the same this time BUT you have prior knowledge of it , and know you can deal with it..so your perception of it will be different.

Report
sleepfinder · 20/07/2007 15:48

Good point Lulumama.

OP posts:
Report
FlameDelacour · 20/07/2007 15:51

Erm... I will lie.

Yes, wondefully quick and easy

Report
sleepfinder · 20/07/2007 16:01

So what was the problem FD? Why bad or worse 2nd time round?

OP posts:
Report
FlameDelacour · 20/07/2007 16:08

First one was 15 hours start to finish, with established labour about 4 1/2 hours...in the pool for the last hour or so

2nd one was 25 hours start to finish... not enough pain to need anything for them for the most part, but too much to sleep through. Midwife came at about 3am ish (I think), examined me and said sod all was going on, then took her gas and air away with her (it was 21 hours in by then). She came back around 6am and gave me the g&a, told me I wasn't dilated enough to get in the pool - DS was born less than 2 hours later. She refused to listen to me about how my last labour went (similar situation of seemingly not a lot happening, and then suddenly being very dilated), tried to ration my gas & air (homebirth), and wouldn't let me in the pool.

By the end I was just exhausted and grumpy.

I think it was the length that was the main thing, I was sooo tired through not sleeping for 25 hours and contracting a min of every 10 mins for the entire time.

Report
sleepfinder · 20/07/2007 16:11

FD that sounds tough. Midwife care also not particularly helpful in that instance...sorry to hear it.

OP posts:
Report
Lostmykeys · 20/07/2007 16:15

FD had very similar births to you - first born was a water birth that I breezed through, but second time round was the birth from hell, but generally people unsymapathetic because it was your second!! But Sleepfinder the general pattern seems to be second time round quicker and easier so fingers crossed!! Plus, you still love 'em just as much when they finally arrive!

Report
puppydavies · 20/07/2007 16:38

1st transferred homebirth, epidural, ventouse 42 hrs

2nd transferred homebirth, epidural, vaginal delivery, 30 hrs

quicker but perhaps because was shaping up so similar to first time i decided to transfer sooner.

Report
FlameDelacour · 20/07/2007 16:41

One bright side of mine was that my placenta literally fell out - I was sort of crouching/kneeling on the floor having picked up DS, we decided to move me to a better position for the placenta... and found it on the floor!

If I have another I will make it very clear early on how my labours go, and do what I think is right.

Report
FlameDelacour · 20/07/2007 16:41

Why the transfers?

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

allgonebellyup · 20/07/2007 16:41

2nd was much much worse!!

but only because my 1st was amazingly quick (did tear lots though!)

My 2nd had the world's most enormous head and thus could not exit me very well or speedily!! hours and hours of pushing, and many broken blood vessels in my face!! (mmm i looked so attractive)

the little bastard would NOT come out!!!!

Report
SanetJvv · 20/07/2007 16:42

1st. one week early. 5 hours in labour, waterbirth gas and air. Only a laseration.

2nd born on due date. 2 hours in labour, waterbirth gas and air. delivering the head was more painfull than 1st time. Intact perineum.

Report
puppydavies · 20/07/2007 16:43

lack of progress. i was apparently getting less dilated w/no 2

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.