Perhaps Mums-to-be need to read the court's decision which some may feel excuses those responsible for deciding budgets overrides what parents may prefer?
Another unborn child starved of oxygen before birth - maybe this government's promise of no-fault compensation ARE just more BS by politicians.
After all, 15 years ago the same considerations were aired by another government - all just BS leaving grieving mums & dads to deal unaided, unfunded and very much alone!
The summary is;
MEDICAL PRACTITIONER — Negligence — Duty to advise — Expectant mother regarded as having high-risk pregnancy due to small stature and diabetes — Doctor not advising of risks of vaginal birth and possibility of delivery by caesarian section — Baby sustaining serious injuries during vaginal delivery — Whether doctor negligent in failing to advise of risks
Supreme Court summary link is; tinyurl.com/jtsp77k
One wonders how many times cost conscious NHS Trusts keep managing the births of severely damaged children?
Is the measure of reasonable risks parental consideration would accept for the mum to be overridden by, what others decide is best in all their (budget) considerations?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Childbirth
When the costs for a Cesarean are preferred over safest first as Mum may wish?
6 replies
2020Truthteller · 10/01/2017 14:03
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.