Midwifery unit or consultant-led unit?(32 Posts)
Hello. Will try and keep this brief whilst including all relevant information. I'm in the first trimester of pregnancy with DC2 and have my booking appointment in a few days. I know they are likely to ask me where I would like to give birth. There are two options in my area:
1) Consultant led unit which is about 45 mins to an hours drive from my house (traffic dependent).
2) Midwifery unit which is about 20-25 minutes drive from my house.
With DD I chose to go to the consultant led unit as I was hoping for an epidural and also I wanted the reassurance of knowing there were doctors around if needed. However my labour progressed quicker than expected, and I found the car drive to the consultant led unit awful (and that was with basically no traffic on the road as it was 2am). When I got there the midwife in the assessment unit kept insisting on telling me I was probably just having early stage labour pains, and didn't rush to get me transferred to delivery. By the time I got to the delivery suite DD was born 10 minutes later and I didn't even get time for any gas and air, let alone an epidural. DD got a bit stressed by the quick delivery too and there was some meconium in her waters when she was born, but thankfully although they said she needed to be kept in for 12 hours for observations she was well enough to go home that day. I never saw a doctor the whole time I was there. Also the postnatal ward was noisy (shared dorm with 4 other women, and so there was always at least one baby crying at any time, so sleep was impossible). It was also very busy and I didn't get an awful lot of support from the midwives there as they just had so many women to look after (I felt quite sorry for the staff on the post-natal unit to be honest as they were clearly very stretched).
So second time around I'm thinking about going to the midwifery unit. It's much closer (which is important as also we need for my Mum to come over - a 30 minute drive away- to look after DD before we go anywhere), and there's a reasonable chance labour 2 will be quicker than labour 1 (so probably unlikely I'll get an epidural this time either). They are also a small unit (rarely have more than 2 women in at a time), and other people who have given birth there have told me how lovely and relaxed it is there, plus all the rooms are private and en-suite so no shared facilities. I am nevous though in case something goes wrong and there's no doctors around, although I am told in the event of any complications they will blue-light you the consultant unit, but that's a 20-30 minute drive away. I guess with DD being stressed during labout last time I'm worried in case anything goes wrong. I also know a mum who started her labour in the midwifery unit but needed transferring to the consultant unit, but unfortunately due to the time involved in the transfer the baby was starved of oxygen and ended up with brain damage.
If you were me what would you do?
Of course there is also the option of a home birth (which the midwife who delivered DD said to me I should consider if I ever get pregnant again due to the speed I gave birth and risk of giving birth in a car in future). But I'm not sure if I'm brave enough for that.
I would go for the midwife led unit. Your friend's experience is heartbreaking but not the same risks as you have, which is that you are likely to have a quick delivery. I'd prefer to have a midwife/ambulance on hand than give birth in the car.
If you end up having a long labour and need an epidural, presumably you could transfer to the consultant led unit?
I'd go for the consultant led unit...It's one day at the end of it and then you're back home anyway, touch wood. I think ppl make too much of expecting it to be like a 2 week all inclusive spa break! To me the intention is to come home with a healthy baby! I'm due any day with my third and although I only had gas and air with my first two (had both in labour ward), I'd rather have all my options laid out...just in case. No one ever plans for an emergency or for their baby to become distressed but I'd much rather know there were doctors and anaesthetists close by to whip baby out if it all did go wrong very quickly.
Saying that I'm only 5 mins from the hospital so sounds like you'll need to set off a bit earlier anyway wherever you decide to go!
I would go for MLU or home on what you've said. I was absolutely bloody stunned by how fast DC2 came and I didn't have a particularly short labour with DC1.
I also hated the car journey when in labour - thank god it was the middle of the night as I had DH slowing down to 10mph during each contraction!
the question to ask your friend was whether there were any signs of distress before the emergency. If there were signs of distress that were ignored or a reluctance to transfer earlier in the labour then I personally wouldn't go there. If ur friend or anyone else you know found that the midwife reacted quickly at the first sign of issues and the transfer was prompt then I would be happy enough to go to MLU given you are low risk and in most cases there are signs and time to transfer in case of issues. Nothing is risk free but on balance in those circumstances MLU sounds like a fair option for you
Would definitely like to know more about your friend's situation - i delivered my first in the MLU and was intending to do the same this time (due next month) but your post has worried me.
Tbh I had to transfer from a MLU with DC1. I sensed a reluctance by the midwives to admit that it was no longer a straightforward labour (despite multiple signs) and to transfer. I had to be very persistent and then the transfer process was a shambles. It took over an hour. Hospital staff were lovely on arrival and although my concerns were confirmed, we had the right people around us to ensure no long term harm came to either of us. My advice with MLU is to ask someone who had a complicated labour how well it was handled. If they handle these things well then it's a lovely safe place to birth. Also if you have already had 1DC without issues you are much less likely to have complications.
I would go for the consultant-led unit every time. I went to a midwife led unit but the baby got stuck and lots of complications and ended up with me being rushed over to consultants. It was touch and go and this time they have told me they would prefer me to be at a consultant led unit due to what happened before. I know the midwife birth units look amazing and calm and in theory they should be but for me, its the 'what if' scenario that doesn't sit well. I agree with nectarini1983.
I think having read your posts I'm leaning more towards the consultant led unit. I want to talk to the community midwife on Friday though as the problem I had with my first labour is that the hospital weren't even open to the possibility of me coming in before my contracions were 3-4 minutes apart, and I think if I have to wait that long second time around it might be too late, and I really don't want to end up giving birth on the side of the road.
To be clear I don't expect the hospital to be like a 2-week spa break. But I was quite tearful after giving birth with DD1, and I was struggling to breastfeed, so I found the lack of privacy or abilty to sleep quite hard in the post-natal ward, hence why I mentioned the private facilities in the MLU.
I'm afraid I don't know the details of the mum whose baby ended up being starved of oxygen. She was a Mum I met at a baby group rather than a close friend, and the group no longer runs, but her little boy had obvious brain damage, and she did tell us once (we didn't ask) that unfortunately there were complications in her labour and she needed an emergency C-section, but by the times she was transferred to the consultant led unit her little boy had already been without adequate oxygen for too long and suffered brain damage. I'm assuming there were no warning signs of potential complications before labour started or else I think they would have made her go to the consultant led unit in the first place.
I am in a similar position Op. I had a quick first labour and am an hours drive from a major labour unit. I think I have decided that a midwife led unit, with the possibility of an ambulance transfer feels safer to me than the possibility (not an insignificant one) of delivering en route to the hospital with no medical assistance. If nearer the time the circumstances of my pregnancy suggest there are any additional risk factors I will reconsider, but at the moment that's my plan...
I've just had my second in an mlu, having had my first in clu after meconium in the water and an erratic heartbeat.
Check what the transfer protocol are from the mlu to clu. Ours says 9 minutes between the two in an ambulance (if I were driving it would be closer to 25, I think).
My mlu birth was so, so, so much better than my first, I feel completely different.but it is an understandable desire not to choose it.
I started off at MLU 2 yrs ago with DD but had to be blue-lighted due to meconium. The rest of my Labour was a car crash...how I wish we could've stayed at MLU.
Eleven weeks ago I gave birth at MLU and it was just brilliant. Giving birth under water was amazing and managing on just gas & air (i got to 6cm at home - worth sticking it out for as long as possible at home) and gave birth 40 minutes after arriving at MLU. Go for it, OP, you won't get a better birthing experience (unless you hire a pool at home, which is exactly what I'll do next time).
I would go consultant led.
I had my last (second baby) in the MLU and we had to be transferred. My baby is fine, but it was risky and shocking. Wish I'd gone consultant led from the beginning.
I fully planned MLU with my first. Luckily I was so late I needed to be in CLU. This probably (though who can say) saved my son's life. Everything was absolutely fine - think yoga, soft lights, gas and air until...he fell back to back, wouldn't turn, became stuck with the cord around his neck. It went from fine to an emergency so quickly and the staff were just fantastic. Son was delivered back to back and needed resus. He suffered no long term effects but had we been in the MLU with a transfer of 30 mins for us...who knows. It might never have played out that way but I'm due my second baby in 4 weeks. Put it this way, there is no way I'd consider going anywhere else but CLU.
BUT - most of my friends have laboured in MLU and had really good experiences. My friend recently had a brilliant water birth. It's such a personal choice. (My other friend delivered in MLU and was blue lighted to CLU, baby was left with dad at less than an hour old - no skin to skin with her, no initial feed etc...).
For every horror story for one venue there will be another wonderful experience. It's such a hard choice. Good luck.
One important thing is not to buy into the idea that all MLU births are xxxx and all hospital births are xxxx. People have good and bad experiences in both settings. Therefore this decision has to be about you and where you are likely to feel most comfortable, safe, supported. This will help you feel happier with the experience no matter what happens. You could sign up for the MLU and then see how you feel in labour and how fast it's progressing? If you turn up at the hospital instead they can't turn you away so you would have the best of both worlds that way? You could also ask about signing up for homebirth so that a midwife would come to you but transferring in if you want to and you have time?
According to the Birth Place study you're about 5x more likely to need a c/s (for second babies) if you choose to labour in a CLU compared to an MLU, and no more likely to come home with a well baby...
Higher rates of forceps too.
"but it was risky and shocking"
But nationally outcomes for babies are no worse in free standing MLU's, and are MASSIVELY better for women themselves.
Can you have a tour around both units before you decide? I really don't understand why there would be a MLU without a CLU right next to it if the birth stops being straightforward.
Obviously people posting here will be biased by negative experiences. To me you sound low risk and like you'll have a quick birth, so MLU sounds ideal! I had two births at MLU and they were both absolutely fantastic.
MLU all the way in my opinion.
Meconium with your first labour dies not mean baby was distressed by the way. 20% of babies pass meconium either before or during birth. There is not actually much research to back up the need for transferring and treating the labour as high risk.
Im in the same situation, i want the MLU but im scared im going to need the consultant who will be 45mins away!
minifingers in that stat you give about c sections are they comparing emcs only and for low risk women in both places? Or are they comparing all women who birth in hospital (including high risk women and planned or ELCS) with those at MLU?
" in that stat you give about c sections are they comparing emcs only and for low risk women in both places? Or are they comparing all women who birth in hospital (including high risk women and planned or ELCS) with those at MLU?"
Comparing only women who are low risk at the start of labour according to their chosen (as opposed to eventual) birth setting.
The stats for mums having their second/subsequent baby are actually:
(CLU - consultant led unit, FMU - freestanding midwife led unit)
Normal birth (ie no episiotomy, no drip, no instruments, no c/s)
Using birth pool
Outcomes for baby the same
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.