This might sound daft, but I read on here a lot that second/third/fourth births are much faster than first ones. Is this the case even if you had a c-section for the first one?
I was induced for my first birth, laboured for 20 odd hours, got to 10cm, but then had to have an EMCS because of the baby's position. If I tried a VBAC next time, would it be faster (because my cervix has dilated before) or would it still be long (because I didn't manage the pushing bit)?
I'm nowhere near ready to try for number 2, but already wondering if it's 'better the devil you know' or if I'd rather attempt a VBAC...
Thanks.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Childbirth
Are second births faster even if you had a c-section first time?
9 replies
ATruthUniversallyAcknowledged · 05/09/2011 15:07
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.