My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

Rather weird question, but anyone good on family history, 19th century etc?

11 replies

GrendelsMum · 05/11/2009 20:13

I've just come across two men, one early nineteenth century, one later nineteenth century, whose first name was 'King'. With the first one (the excellently named King Sparks), I assumed his mother's surname was 'King'. Now I've come across the second one (King Huggeston), I'm starting to wonder if this was actually a name? Or perhaps just a coincidence, and he too had a relative whose surname was King.

OP posts:
Report
doubleexpresso · 05/11/2009 20:51

Can't really help I'm afraid, but I am interested in the answer. I've always loved the name Isambard Kingdom Brunel...

Report
WickedWench · 05/11/2009 21:27

The normal naming convention was to give the first born son his mother's maiden name as a middle name rather than a first name. That has certainly been borne out by my research anyway.

It could just be a favoured family name. Sometimes children were named after a wealthy relative in the hope that they would leave them a wodge of cash look kindly on them.

Some families just have names they like to hand down from generation to generation. I worked with a woman whose DH's family insisted that all the first born boys were called George. She called her first born DS Oliver

Report
WickedWench · 05/11/2009 21:32

Oi Mumsnet. Yer strikeout thingy aint working!

Report
MrsBadger · 05/11/2009 21:51

you have to strike out word individually, not a whole sentence

see, tis fine

Report
GrendelsMum · 05/11/2009 21:57

But King is such a daft name to give a child, that you really have to hope that the wealthy relatives did indeed cough up lots of dosh.

OP posts:
Report
WickedWench · 05/11/2009 22:20

Aha Mrs Badger, now I understand, thanks.

I would hope they did cough up lots of dosh too GrendelsMum. But I have come across some weird and wonderful names whilst researching my family tree.

My favourite family - who are not related to me but were neighbours of one of my ancestors in a census return - are the Bastard family. And no, they didn't have a son called Robin!

I'm absolutely serious. They were REALLY called that!

Report
MrsWoolf · 06/11/2009 02:39

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

nooka · 06/11/2009 04:41

My dh's grandfather was called Baron, so perhaps not that strange.

Report
GrendelsMum · 06/11/2009 19:43

Thanks everyone - I shall continue to dig around and see what I find.

OP posts:
Report
frakkinaround · 06/11/2009 19:46

It is a name. King, Baron, Earl and Prince are all listed in my baby names book but I'm not sure how common it was in the 19th century.

Report
bigstripeytiger · 06/11/2009 19:51

There is a person in my family tree with the first name Sparks.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.