My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

Frank or Leo? Is Frank a full name in its own right? Baby due in a few days!

34 replies

preggiemeggie · 02/11/2009 10:34

Hi all,

Baby is nearly here and we're down to two boy's names - Frank and Leo.
Frank would probably be Frankie when he's little. It wouldn't be Francis (as I would like) as DH hates it. But do you think Frank is now largely regarded as a 'proper name'?

Any thoughts/opinions most welcome!

OP posts:
Report
LowLevelWhingeing · 02/11/2009 10:39

Yep, I know a couple of baby Franks and I have a Francis (middle name), so watch what you say you lot!

Report
stakethroughtheheartofgold · 02/11/2009 10:40

your dh is wrong, francis is a great name :P

Report
peanutbutterkid · 02/11/2009 10:41

Personally, I prefer full names with NNs, so Franklin/Francis with Frank as NN makes sense to me. Or Leo as NN for Leon/Leonard.

I quite like Frank, Leo is ok.

Report
TheDevilEatsBabies · 02/11/2009 10:47

ditto stake: Francis is a great name.

but you can do Frank if you want (i personally would always do the long/full name though because it gives him a bit more choice when he grows up)

Report
Jux · 02/11/2009 10:53

ditto TheDevil.

Report
preggiemeggie · 02/11/2009 11:05

Thanks all - I think Francis is lovely too!But DH is not going to change his mind, alas. I also much prefer 'proper' names with nicknames. Although in the case of Leo it is definitely a classic full name in its own right. We have another option - Michael - but don't like the nicknames! Do you think you can insist on people the full name (rather than Mickey, Mike etc)? It seems a bit controlling!

OP posts:
Report
diddl · 02/11/2009 11:11

´Like Leo and Michael.

And Ithink it´s fine not to shorten-and to ask others not to!

Report
stakethroughtheheartofgold · 02/11/2009 11:28

if there's a possible shortening it will get shortened and there's very little you can do about it especially when they reach school age.

Report
Annabelsmummie · 02/11/2009 11:54

Frank is lovely and is definately a name in its own right imo.

I'm not keen on Leo..

Report
gladders · 02/11/2009 12:43

wow - this is exactly same dilemma my friend had - baby was Leo for two days and has been frankie ever since - is frank in his birth certificate.

FWIW I think Frank is a great name - frankie is perfect for a little boy - go for it!

Report
jellybeans · 02/11/2009 13:34

Much prefer Leo but Frank is OK in it's own right.

Report
Baconsarnie · 02/11/2009 13:40

Frank is totally fine in its own right, IMHO. Like Leo, but love Frank!

Report
megonthemoon · 02/11/2009 13:44

I have a Leo so I love that (and peanutbutterkid - it is a name in its own right, not just a nickname name - there were many popes called Leo!). But I also love Francis - would have it if my DH didn't like it.

Would DH consent to Francis as middle name? Then he could be Leo Francis and if it ends up that you all prefer to call him Frank then he already has both names? Best of all worlds!

Report
MrsWoolf · 02/11/2009 23:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

LilyBolero · 02/11/2009 23:24

I have a Michael, and although generally I'm not keen on nicknames, I do find myself calling him Mikey, which is quite cute! Not keen on Mickey or Mike, but Mikey is sweet.

Report
MadBadandDangerousToKnow · 02/11/2009 23:58

I like Francis as a name, with Frank as an abbreviation.

I always prefer the full version of names (at least for the birth certificate and to give the child more choice in the matter when older). Maybe people around here are particularly precious about names, but all the children seem to be known by the full versions of their names (Joseph and Abigail, not Joe and Abi) so I think if you introduced your son as Michael he would remain a Michael. Which is a fine name.

Report
Brightfield · 03/11/2009 00:00

Francis NN Frank would be my choice. Leo doesn't do much for me.

Report
liliputlady · 03/11/2009 08:52

Actually I like all three of your choices and none of them are overused. I never thought of Frank as not being a name in it's own right.

I think Michael would inevitably get shortened. I chose very simple names for my DDs that I thought were unshortenable, but their friends still manage it and actually, I don't mind now anyway!

Your three names all have a really different feel to them, so may be you just need to see which one suits baby when he arrives. Good luck!

Report
lucyy123 · 03/11/2009 15:34

Leo much better than Frank

Report
Bubbaluv · 03/11/2009 15:49

With Frank I just think of Frank Spencer, so that would be out for me.

Report
Disenchanted3 · 03/11/2009 15:51

Frank is a name in its own Right, My Grandad was Frank

Great name

Report
Squishabelle · 03/11/2009 15:59

Oh I sooooo like Frank but think it might end up being overused like Archie.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

whereareyou · 04/11/2009 23:33

Late posting but love Frank in its own right not as an abbreviation.
Leo lovely as well but Frank is a great name.

Report
bibbitybobbityhat · 04/11/2009 23:36

You MUST have Frank. It is brill.

Report
ThatVikRinA22 · 05/11/2009 00:03

can i be frank? (pun intended) am i the only old git on here then who thinks frank is terrible

quite like francis. leo is fine...but frank is terrible!
dont do that to a baby!

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.