My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

Would it be ridiculous to call...

26 replies

Eleta · 15/07/2008 19:36

Son Charles (shorten to Charlie) when dd1 is called Charlotte? I ave a Charlotte and Molly at the mo and we are really struggling with boys names. We both like Charles/Charlie and dd is never called Charlie or shortened at all for that matter. She has always insisted her name is Charlotte. She is 5.5 now so I think it's unlikely that she would start being called Charlie but does it look silly Charlotte, Molly and Charles?

OP posts:
Report
belgo · 15/07/2008 19:37

Yes it would be a bit odd. Sorry!

Report
QueenMeabhOfConnaught · 15/07/2008 19:38

I wouldn't do it.

Report
NormaStanleyFletcher · 15/07/2008 19:39

She will be charlie at some point - guarantee it

don't do it

Report
HumphreyCushioni · 15/07/2008 19:40

Would be a bit confusing I think.

Report
LongLiveGreenElizabeth · 15/07/2008 19:41

It would, sorry. BUT it's been done before, at least once, because I personally know a charlotte and Charles, half brother and sister, same sur name, different MUM, but they live in the same town and when people figure it out they do puzzled faces.

Report
EachPeachPearMum · 15/07/2008 19:42

I wouldn't- it's like having Paul and Pauline, though I know some people would!

Report
newgirl · 15/07/2008 19:45

def dont do it even if you think lottie and charlie - they will choose their own nicknames - and their mates will - it will just be something you end up explaining all the time - not fair on the kids imo

Report
WinkyWinkola · 15/07/2008 19:47

So many boys names out there. Don't call him Charles!

What about:

Rupert
Frederick (Freddie)
Oscar
Benedict

Obviously I'm stabbing in the dark here as I've no idea what kind of names you'd go for. But don't call your son Charles if your dd is called Charlotte. That's like Erica/Eric, Phillippa/Philip.

Report
blithedance · 15/07/2008 19:51

My cats are Charlie (Charlotte) and Lottie (Lotus)

No kidding!

What's the appeal of Charles? Royalty theme?

Edward/James/Henry/William/Richard/John/George would also fit that.

Report
flowerybeanbag · 15/07/2008 19:57

DD1 is bound to be called Charlie at some point. 5.5 is very young to be so sure about nicknames.

I have a fairly long firstname, I was always called by the whole thing until about 11 or 12, then some of my mates started abbrieviating it, then my family did the same thing. Now most of my friends and family call me by nickname A. Another group of friends spontaneously started calling me a different nickname (B) when I met them in my twenties.

And for work/professional purposes I am the full thing, which obviously bleeds into friends I have from various workplaces.

So I have 3 names, which can be confusing/amusing when groups of friends mix.

But at age 5.5 both myself and my family would have sworn blind that my name was the whole thing and would always be...

Report
beforesunrise · 15/07/2008 20:00

not ridicuolous- just a bit lazy :-)

Report
janeite · 15/07/2008 20:04

I think it sounds silly, sorry.

Report
kitsmummy · 15/07/2008 20:20

I can't see a problem with it whatsoever. I think i'm in the minority though

Report
themildmanneredjanitor · 15/07/2008 20:21

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

AbbeyA · 15/07/2008 20:24

It sounds very silly-don't do it!

Report
violetsmile · 15/07/2008 20:27

I don't see a problem. All gorgeous names and if Charlotte at some point does want to shorten her name then it can also become 'Lottie' which is lovely too and better for a girl than charlie in my opinion. Go for it!

Report
muggglewump · 15/07/2008 20:35

Don't do it!
I made it to 12 without my name being shortened, my brother got to 33 (last year) without his being shortened but it could have happenned much earlier. Now we're called Johnny and Jenny.
Still not a problem as we live at opposite ends of the country and don't keep in touch but it would have been utterly stupid had we both been small and had our names shortened.
No idea if my parents though it through when we were named Jennifer and Jonathan btw

Report
LongLiveGreenElizabeth · 15/07/2008 22:02

What happens if they BOTH want to be charlie though?

Report
Doozie · 15/07/2008 22:09

Yes, it would be too much. I love both names, but don't do it! People will say you have no imagination.

Report
Tommy · 15/07/2008 22:12

my BIL is Stephen and his sister is Stephanie - I've always thought that was a bit

Report
TheRealPhartiphukborlz · 15/07/2008 22:13

would charlotte ever be lottie do you think?

Report
Flibbertyjibbet · 15/07/2008 22:23

I once knew twins called Paul and Paulette.

What were the parents THINKING??

To OP: It doesn't matter whether your daughter or son or both are ever called charlie. The name Charlotte is the girls version of Charles. So in effect you'd be giving them the same name.

Which is odd.

Would you have an Alexander and Alexandra? Francis and Frances? Simon and Simone?
Cos they are the same thing as a Charles and Charlotte.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

tommiles001 · 16/07/2008 07:30

Charles is too similar to Charlotte, how about Carl or Karl? Both are variants of Charles, but spell a tad differently from Charlotte.

Report
Botbot · 16/07/2008 08:50

I went to school with twins called Charles and Charlotte. I always thought it was a bad idea.

Report
muggglewump · 16/07/2008 18:45

Christ were my parents that bad?
I didn't think Jennifer and Jonathan were really since we were known as our full names but maybe I'm wrong?

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.