Should migrant children keep their 'exotic' names?(81 Posts)
Recently I met a lady of Indian origin in a birthday party. She told me that her children has European names (like Lisa, Michael, etc). I saw nothing unusual about that.
However, later on, she and some other friends had a discussion. She insisted that non-European children (from Africa or Asia, etc), born in the UK, should have Western names rather than keeping their original names.
The reason, she said, is that they would have more chance to succeed in life if people heard their names. And I myself remember reading an article which said those job applicants, who adopted Western names, were more likely to be given an interview.
What do you think about this issue? Do you think it is true that non-European children should have Western names if they want to succeed here?
I don't think they should change their names, but I do think it is true that they stand a better chance of success with getting job interviews if they have a Western name, and probably a bland western name. I'm sure I saw a TV programme where they sent equal CVs in under two different names and the WEstern name was often successful where the ethnic name wasn't.
SoupDragon it's sad isn't it about the name thing. I kept my foreign maiden name as it's traditional in my culture. But I know deep down that my CV would probably be looked at more if I have taken DH's bland English surname.
But names are identity. So I can see why people pick foreign names even if living in the UK. It let them hang on to their other identity.
It's very sad and wrong. I think it probably applies to the more creative names of the "white British" as well though.
I 've met south Koreans who have western names and Korean names. They see the European names as who they are as well as the Korean names. In an international world its an aspect that helps them .In the same way English is a business communication language.
My kids go to an ordinary school where people have different backgrounds. One guy from an Africa country said "call me x, because you wont be able to pronounce my African name" So kids did and they respected his ease with both names,so now they use both names its not a problem.
I think its how names are presented, which links to how they are received. If you are Darren,Brian ,mohammed or Tiffeny ,you might think builder or hairdresser, but if they are Dr Darren,dr mohammad, professor Brian, or Tiffeny ceo of a major company then you change your opinion.
There's a great podcast about this here. I think it concludes that contrary to popular opinion your name makes hardly any difference to your success, and that the economic status of parents is by far the biggest indicator of future outcomes for kids.
I think Mollie-Mae or Jayden will be more likely to be judged by their names than Swaminee or Samir.
It says more about the judger than it does the person themselves.
Lol, just googled James Caan.
The actor (from The Godfather etc.) has always been called James Caan.
The one who changed his name was some bloke on Dragons' Den.
Ive got a foreign name and while it is difficult for people to pronounce, it has in fact frequently become a ice breaker as I laugh about the number of tries it takes to say my name properly.
No it has never held me back but that's because i never expected it to.
I think this is one of the self fulfilling prophecies - if you think your name is holding you back it probably will but if you dont then it probably wont.
Having said that, it probably makes a difference if you live in a big cosmopolitan city like London instead of a small village somewhere.
I'm torn - it's a massive shame for people to lose the name aspect of the culture they've come from, and for everyone to end up with a small subset of names that are easy to pronounce and spell for Anglophones.
On the other hand I grew up with a Scottish surname no one could spell right first time, and specifically gave DD the Anglicised version of her French first name (just French in origin, not an unusual name in the UK, we have no French connections) because I knew she'd go through life having to correct people's spelling otherwise.
I don't think they should have to change their names.
Saying that, though, I had a boss who was recruiting a sales manager. He interviewed a man called 'Colin Brown' who, when he turned up, was of Asian origin. Said manager complained to me that he was 'deceitful' and that his name was obviously not 'Colin.' Went on and on about it. I was and
sabrina really [shocked]. Can he really tell if someone is mixed race? I can imagine the UK might even have some Asians with only a British paternal grandfather! My boss's daughter is half Asian and I honestly think she looks totally Asian. Maybe I'm just not that good at picking up ancestry as your sales manager . Like Alexa Chung. I think she looks totally white. Maybe this manager will also say she is deceitful as she couldn't be a Chung!
Wow Sabrina, what an absolute tool. I know a couple of people who that manager would consider to be 'of Asian origin' but have completely English names, because they have their white father's surname and an English first name (because they're English and were born in England!) That's the thing - a person as stupid as your manager is hopefully not going to be particularly influential, long-term, in other people's lives, so ultimately having a non-English name/look won't matter, if you're good at what you do.
I tutored 2 children from Hong Kong they had both been given British names and also had Chinese names.The girl had a name more usually given to boys in this country.Both dc answered to both names but told me they much preferred to use their 'British' names at school.
Oh yes - he was a tool. I wasn't there for much longer thank god, but he was a sexist, racist dinosaur.
'Colin' was definitely Asian - but with a crisp English accent. The sad thing was (I thought) that people try and tackle racism by adopting an English name - but if you're not white, then with people like my boss, it still doesn't matter.
I strongly suspect that if his CV had come in with a name like 'Patel' on it, he wouldn't have even got an interview
You see my DH looks completely Asian, but as his mum is white, he has an English accent and speaks no other languages, and has never been to Asia in his life, it's pretty annoying when people label him as Asian and assume he has some kind of interesting non-English 'heritage' going on. Beyond the fact that his dad, who's been in England for 50 years, cooked the odd curry when they were growing up, he has the same cultural background as most white English people. it's not a major problem or anything, just irritated that he's never seen as English. One woman once commented on how good his English accent is FFS.
Sorry, my last post was not exactly very relevant to the thread It's just all the talk of maintaining 'heritage' by not giving English names etc is not always important or meaningful to people who aren't white.
"I'm Irish, living in Ireland and I think that those giving their children Irish names (with complicated, un obvious spelling) are fettering their children unnecessarily. I had friends who emigrated in the 80's who had to change their names - or the spelling of their names. My children have names that are easy to pronounce and (hopefully) spell for that very reason, yet they go to school with the likes of Caoimbhe, Muireann, Donnchadh, Beibhinn, Blaithin, Aoibheann, Caoileann, Feichinn, Naoishe, Oileann, Roise, Sadhb, Tadhg, and the like who will have to spell their names day in day out (even if they stay in rural Ireland)."
What bollocks. I'm Irish with a very Irish name with fadas and all, and I live in mainland Europe. Yes, I have to spell my name to new people, and nobody gets the pronunciation right first time, but the same happens to my friend Amy, who also has to spell and pronounce her name for new people, what with Amy being a 'foreign' name in this country, and most other non-anglophone countries.
I'm proud of my name and proud that my parents gave me a name that reflects my rich heritage. It hasn't fettered me at all.
I know people who have even changed their surname. Apparently people feel their job applications will be treated more fairly.
I do not think you should change a child's name. Shortening a name is fine.
I lived in Italy for a year on a teaching exchange programme. When I was in the classroom I was asked to call the children by their 'English' names (which often were far from the original Italian in sound) and my name was changed into its Italian equivalent 'Giovanna'.
From my part; it made me mad at first as I am very proud of my name and what it represents. I am very proud of my nationality and want to be known as British wherever I go. I was aware that I was treated very differently as a 'straniere' (stranger/foreigner) whilst there.
For others; I believe it is a personal choice what they prefer to be called. If they feel more integrated with an 'English' name then so be it.
There is still an idea out there that changing your name makes you integrate into local culture better. Does this mean that in the U.K. we may be less tolerant than we anticipate - or it this an idea that is generated purely overseas?
It's certainly an interesting topic to pursue. I am not sure of any answers yet.
Totally agree Sollers. I've always had to spell my name for people. They get over it.
It's a personal choice I suppose.
DH has a foreign name and its not bothered him too much. His mum anglicised her name briefly as she got fed up spelling it, but that lasted for about a week!
We have friends who have Italian and French names on their birth certs (born here to foreign parents) who answer to their original or anglicised versions of their names.
DS answers to any version of his very british name. My name is frequently frenchified (more popular over there), or made to sound italian by my italian friends. I even have a japanese version by a korean friend.
My Sri Lankan friend - born in ther UK (and her siblings) has a very traditional name. She is very very posh english though! Her parents (born in Sri Lanka) have names similar to Hilda and Frank (I kid you not - must've been the fashion in the 1930s).
We live in London - maybe its a weird london thing!
I wonder how much difference there is in people's feelings about having to spell their names vs having to correct people? I've always thought 'how do you spell that?' would be far less irritating than people assuming they could spell your name, but getting it wrong - my maiden name is by far the most common variant but unfortunately for my sanity the famous person it belonged to spelled it one of the other ways and people would use either that or some made-up version. I suspect if you have a name no one even thinks they can spell without asking it's just as annoying really.
My very british surname is spelled exactly the way it is said. Even when I say it to people they still try to overcomplicate it and throw in random letters!
DHs name, is exactly the same - spelled exactly as pronounced, but mainly mispronounced. His/our surname for some reason, is always mispronounced (italianised for some reason) and part of the last part missed out.
People are so odd!
Same as Loves, if it doesn't matter, then rather than repeat then spell my name. I just say "smith", works in cafes etc
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.