I have noticed on here that some nickname type names seem to be seen as not substantial enough to be 'proper' names - examples that spring to mind are Molly, Ellie, Millie etc. However, others which are also shortened versions of other names seem to perceived as ok - Katie, Sophie for instance.
Can anyone explain to me why this is? I genuinely am interested to know. I ask as I really like the name Cassie but don't want to give DD an 'insubstantial', nicknamey name and don't like the longer versions like Cassandra etc. Thanks.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.
Baby names
Why are some nickname type names more 'acceptable' than others?
26 replies
bluecars · 15/10/2012 16:06
OP posts:
1944girl ·
15/10/2012 23:52
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.