My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Find baby name inspiration and advice on the Mumsnet Baby Names forum.

Baby names

would it be really cruel...

20 replies

goatshavestrangeeyes · 30/06/2011 14:07

if we had a boy to name him Charlie, even though our surname is Dickens?

Charles is a very important family name and Charlie is one of about 3 names we can agree on. We already have a middle name so won't be using it for that. Or would it just be plain evil?

Grin

OP posts:
Report
mistressploppy · 30/06/2011 14:08

I would do it. But then I'm a bit silly Grin

Seriously, why not? It's not as if Charles Dickens was a nasty man or anything

Report
TrilllianAstra · 30/06/2011 14:08

It wouldn't be the kindest thing you could do for him, no.

Report
swash · 30/06/2011 14:23

I think it would, yes.

Report
razzlebathbone · 30/06/2011 14:27

Sometimes you just have to accept that you shouldn't use a name even if you love it. This is one of those times. Unless you would be prepared to double barrell your surnames, so Charlie xxxxx - Dickens.

Report
MsChanandlerBong · 30/06/2011 15:11

I'm afraid I think it would be a bit mean too. You mentioned it was one of about three names that you agree on... so I would go for one of the other two if I were you.

Report
LetThereBeRock · 30/06/2011 16:37

It'd be wrong.

Report
AberdeenAngusina · 30/06/2011 17:06

Why not have two middle names; the one you've chosen already and Charlie?

Report
headfairy · 30/06/2011 17:08

I think so. I used to know someone who was a direct descendent of Charles Dickens and even he wasn't called Charles Dickens :o

Report
SloganLogan · 30/06/2011 17:20

I wouldn't do it. What are the other names you like?

Report
ChessPiece · 30/06/2011 17:27

I know a James Mason Grin When introduced to him, it made me think of the actor instead of thinking about the person in front of me IYSWIM.

Report
headfairy · 30/06/2011 17:32

I also knew an Oliver Reed, though his surname was spelled Reid. Not good to share a name with a famous drunk who occasionally acted.

Report
missmiss · 30/06/2011 17:35

It would be cruel to put Charlie on the birth certificate.

Report
Littlefish · 30/06/2011 17:36

Please don't do it.

Report
MinnieBar · 30/06/2011 17:38

I knew a Thomas Cook. I used to inwardly giggle every time I saw him (and wonder 'what were his parents thinking?!'.

I suppose if you're going to put 'Charlie' on the birth certificate the link might not be apparent.

'Hi, I'm Charlie Dickens' sounds ok. Just.

Report
CharlieBoo · 30/06/2011 17:49

Mnmm agree with other posters... Our surname is Jones which ruled out Tom and Grace for us! Sometimes you have to accept you can't use a name... I can see why you love Charlie though!

Report
birdofthenorth · 30/06/2011 17:58

Yes, silly. I stopped a friend naming her babba Thomas Moore & Sir T is less famous than Charles D!

I know a Michael Jackson, a Janet Jackson & a Michael Kane they all have bad relations with their parents Wink

Report
TheSecondComing · 30/06/2011 18:05

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

birdofthenorth · 30/06/2011 20:09

Don't tell my friend that Second, I think she still begrudges me & a whole pub full of (mostly Catholic) people greeting the idea of Thomas Moore with "Sir, Sir" and "off with his head!"!

Report
squeak2392 · 30/06/2011 21:00

:O Charlie Dickens would be amazing!!!
Apparently I'm alone in thinking this, but I'd definitely do it if I was particularly keen on Charlie!
At least it's Dickens and not Manson Wink

Report
BikeRunSki · 30/06/2011 21:09

I would, but I am called Alice Cooper.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.