Talk

Advanced search

NUCHAL size 2.6 - normal?

(9 Posts)
mrsfazruns Tue 30-Jun-15 09:31:34

Hi everyone. Considering I'm a nurse im struggling to get my head round the numbers and meanings for the NT screen! Had scan yesterday at 12+2 and baby measuring 13 weeks! Nuchal size was 2.6 (not got bloods back yet) .... Is this normal!?

SaulGood Tue 30-Jun-15 09:37:52

Utterly. smile Here, anything under 3.5mm is considered normal. The further on you are, the thicker it tends to be. I had my NT at 13+6 for example and DS's nuchal fold was 2.9mm.

The bloods are necessary however, to give you an actual figure. Anything below 1:150 is low risk.

mrsfazruns Tue 30-Jun-15 09:46:38

Brilliant thank you! Seems like pregnancy is a list of worries that start as the lasts one finishes! Should get bloods in 10 days so will wait to see. Thanks again

SaulGood Tue 30-Jun-15 09:49:20

Don't panic if you get a results letter earlier than that and open it with your heart in your mouth. I was told 10 days with mine and it was more like 3. Same with smear tests actually. The letter appears on the doorstep within a couple of days and you panic that it's a rushed notice of everything being terribly wrong. IME, it's just that the NHS is far more efficient than the time frames estimated. smile

mrsfazruns Tue 30-Jun-15 09:57:00

Oh good hope so! My scan appt was like that .... Went to gp on a thurs with BFP and had had scan date by the monday

Appleblossom82 Tue 30-Jun-15 15:55:03

I had nuchal of 2.6mm at 12+1 and we were put in the elevated risk category just to warn you.

It was my age (33), the nt and low papp-a that gave us a risk of 1:85. They said the nt was within normal threshold but towards the higher end of normal so it was a factor thst gave us a higher risk though its nothing to worry about in itself.

Im not saying it to freak you out. More the opposite that it was all fine for us despite 2 weeks of hell waiting for harmony test results to give us the all clear.

Appleblossom82 Tue 30-Jun-15 15:56:06

Just seen you are measuring 13 weeks so probably not at the higher end for that gestation

crispiecrunchie Thu 02-Jul-15 20:33:59

A positive story, I had a nuchal of 2.6 too and I'm 42. Came back low risk when combined with blood tests. Harmony test gave 10000 to 1 risk. I was amazed at nhs risk given my advanced years!!

Appleblossom82 Thu 02-Jul-15 20:37:12

Isnt that funny crispie? I guess your bloods must have been spot on.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now