Talk

Advanced search

1:20 chance of Downs HELP and Advise please.

(67 Posts)
plumblusher Sat 17-Sep-11 16:08:08

Please help,went for my 12 week dating scan and nuchal test last wednesday. I'm almost 14 weeks, midwife phoned me today (Saturday) to tell me I had a 1:20 chance of DS. She said I can have a CVC on Tuesday or wait til I'm 16 weeks and have an amnio. I'm so shocked and confused DH is at work and I feel I have no-one to talk to about this. She said the risk of miscarriage for the CVC is 1:100 and amnio is 1:150. I am 35 and although I have a healthy 5yr old DD I have had three previous MC's. What do I do? Any advice greatly received. I bled for two and a half weeks at 6wks and presumed I'd already lost it,but an early scan showed a heart beat. I definitely want to know but which procedure do I opt for? HELP HELP HELP.

Truffleshuffler Sat 17-Sep-11 16:14:59

So sorry plum, I think that you should wait the 2 weeks for the amnio as it is less risky, (because if you did have the CVC then MC you would feel really guilty on top of everything else) although that is easy for me to say as you'll be stressing and will want to know one way or the other right now. Maybe do a bit of online research about the procedures before deciding which one you feel comfortable with?
Hope this helps x

plumblusher Sat 17-Sep-11 16:24:39

Truffles I'm so grateful for your reply-I'm actually in tears! I'm torn because I dont know whether I can wait two weeks. If I have the CVC I'll know next week, am I just being selfish?

Truffleshuffler Sat 17-Sep-11 16:40:32

There is no right answer Plum but I think you can wait two weeks, just pretend to yourself that there is no option of the CVC.

DontTellAnyonebut Sat 17-Sep-11 17:01:34

The rates for a miscarriage having a CVS should not be that high. Where are you? Can you get to Prof Nicholaides in London? My doc, who was trained by him has a rate of less than 1 in 200.

I have had 2 cvs for around the same odds as you, one actually a lot worse. There is lots of information, but basically your odds are given by soft markers (NT measurement, nasal bone, bloods and age). They could indicate something is wrong, but certainly do not mean something is wrong. If your odds were 1 in 10,000 you could still be the '1'.

The cvs tests for the main syndromes, DS, Edwards, Pattau (which are fatal) and for sickle cell. It also checks CF (i think) with 85% accuracy.

I would not hesitate to have another CVS. Both my two children are fine.

herecomesthsun Sat 17-Sep-11 18:59:39

Prof Nicolaides told me about a month ago that his risk from CVS is 1 in 500 and that this is lower than the risk for amnio. If he does a CVS on a Weds you can get the result back on a Friday by 3pm. As long as the procedure goes well, you would then know that a significant part of the risk was over. That is to say, if the procedure goes well, the extra risk of miscarriage after that is supposedly 1 in 1000.

I had a risk of about 1 in 135 according to the NHS and 1 in 18 according to the Fetal Medicine Centre. In the end, hubby and I decided not to do through with the CVS despite the low risk, because I very much want this baby, and would have found it very hard had anything gone wrong with the CVS, and he thinks terminating for DS would be wrong, so we are living with the added risk. We are thinking we would go ahead anyway with the pregnancy, so there is less point with incurring added risk. We knew I would be likely to be a bit high risk because of my age (I am 47) so we were living with that anyway, and the chances of another pregnancy are low, we were lucky to have this other chance.

However, if I were to have had a CVS I would have gone to Prof Nicolaides, and I was tempted, as Prof said there would be value just in knowing.

herecomesthsun Sat 17-Sep-11 19:03:33

Oh, also, bleeding can affect some of the blood results (I would have to look it up again though, exactly how) so I wonder whether that could have artificially pushed up your risk a bit?

ghislaine Sat 17-Sep-11 19:23:03

Hi Plumblusher,

This must be a very worrying time for you, and it's not surprising you can't think straight.

I think there are a few things to take into consideration. I've had cvs twice, once with a 1:2 risk for T21 (it was T21) and once with a 1:1896 risk (it wasn't). Neither resulted in a miscarriage. I've never had a miscarriage, so that wasn't a particular fear for me, although I can understand why you would be scared to do anything that would increase your risk of miscarriage.

So, a few things -

Do you know what has led to your risk? As DontTell says, there are soft markers which indicate a higher risk of Down's syndrome: NT measurement, blood hormone levels (PAPP-A and beta HCG), blood flow between the liver and the heart (the flow through the ductus venosus), and the blood flow between the chambers of the heart. Not all hospitals use all these markers so you may not have all this information.

Some of these are more indicative than others eg 85% of babies with tricuspid regurgitation (the heart marker) also have Down's. Reverse flow through the ductus venosus also strongly suggests Down's. My first baby had both of these, which meant the likelihood of him having Down's has probably more than 50% even though his NT measurement was 1.5mm.

Secondly, your risk of Down's is currently 5%, and your stated miscarriage risk is 1%. So the likelihood of your baby having Down's is 5x the likelihood of you miscarrying from cvs. This will only change to 5% vs 0.67% with amnio. Only you know whether that's even of a difference to make the wait worthwhile.

Thirdly, as herecomesthesun says, the quoted rate for cvs (and amnio) is very out of date. In the hands of an experienced practitioner, it is much less. That's why I went ahead with a risk ratio of 1:1896 the second time even though most people will probably think I was a fool to do so. The rate also stems from research done in the 70s when they used to do cvs and amnio blind (no ultrasound, they just palpated the uterus and went in with the needle). I confirmed this with my consultant at the second cvs. So it is much safer now but they can't update the stats because no woman would agree to blind cvs when ultrasound is available! And, if you have cvs/amnio, many miscarriages that do occur, occur not because of the procedure, but because of the underlying health of the baby. But no-one would be able to pinpoint why the baby died, so it is attributed to the procedure because that is the unusual intervening event in the pregnancy.

I wish you all the best in making your decision - do come back and ask more questions if it helps, I know how awful it is to be faced with the prospect of something being wrong with your baby and wanting (and waiting) to know the truth.

ghislaine Sat 17-Sep-11 19:24:17

Sorry, enough of a difference.

RockyRoads Sat 17-Sep-11 20:45:05

Hi Plumblusher

I was in a similar situation about 6 weeks ago (with odds of 1 in 3) and opted to have the CVS. I wouldn't hesitate to have it done again - the procedure itself was fine and it gives you your answers a lot earlier than an amnio. I got an initial 'FISH' result within 24 hours (for the three well known chromosomal disorders) and the long term results for more unusual disorders after 15 days or so. As people have said above, I think mc risk quoted is out of date and, in any event, can be minimised by the practitioner who undertakes the procedure.

If you can think ahead this far, the step after CVS is a heart echo and abnormality scan at 20 weeks or so. This is an extremely long wait (I feel like time has stood still), but the benefit of having had the CVS is knowing the status of any chromosomal abnormality. In my case the results were negative, which is comforting, but if they had been positive, knowing early would have helped me greatly in terms of next steps.

It's such a personal choice, and I completely understand your dilemma, however a lot of people place great value on CVS as an early diagnostic tool so I would not rule it out completely.

Please let us know how you get on, it's such a horrible time and sometimes good to get things off your chest in a safe, anonymous forum.

herecomesthsun Sun 18-Sep-11 03:36:10

Hi again. Hope you have been able to get some sleep tonight. Just a couple of things.

If you went for a different CVS provider - one with a better risk for CVS like the Fetal Medcine Centre - then it seems they would routinely do another scan and bloods 1st. When I went to the FMC they checked for different soft markers and used different baseline odds for age. There are people on mumsnet who came away with a very different set of odds - in my case it was worse but for other people it was very reassuringly better.

I also had had 3 mcs and know I have a tendency to bleed a lot afterwards. That made me more wary of having a CVS because it involves a sample being taken from the placenta and I did not want to risk bleeding. I should say this was more a gut feeling than based on hard scientific evidence. I would discuss the issue that you previously had bleeding though, it does feature in some protocols for CVS as a consideration.

I did discuss the options at length, both with a midwife from the team looking after me and with the ARC which was very helpful. They are open (from 10) Mon - Fri here 020 7631 0285.

Wishing you peace of mind and the eventual results that you want x

LaLaLaLayla Sun 18-Sep-11 03:40:47

Yea, go to Prof Nikolaides. According to his nurse, he has never lost a baby. We were in the same position as you. We spent all our savings on our CVS with Prof N (400 quid!) but it was worth it.

herecomesthsun Sun 18-Sep-11 07:32:28

It was £180 for the scan but would have been another £320 for the CVS, so a total of £500.

EttiKetti Sun 18-Sep-11 07:41:17

I am sorry for your shock, having been there myself, I know the worry it causes.

I hope you've been given a little more than.your OP suggests, in that you were advised to consider what you will do should you end up with a positive result after further testing. You also need to be aware this is a risk factor, and even ladies with a 1:35000 risk factor can be that 1.

I only mention all this as sadly in my experience, I've found these tests are not explained and counselled for clearly. Only you and your DH can make the decision on testing, but I wish you well with your decision and results.

plumblusher Sun 18-Sep-11 09:58:18

Thank you all so much. I did manage to sleep last night,think i'd spent the whole day worrying that it wore me out. I live in Shropshire so the travel down to London is not an easy choice for me. Ghislaine your message was really helpful and informative. When it is put into a percentage number it doesnt feel as scary. Didnt realise also that early bleeding/spotting can affect bloods.I haven't really been told the reason behind the diagnosis just that the baby's measurements my age and my bloods combined produced a 1:20 chance. Having read all the posts here and elsewhere I do feel less scared about a cvs. Just think I'd send my self potty not knowing for 2 weeks, waiting for an amnio. Whatever the outcome I just need to know so that I can deal with it in my head. Honestly I am so grateful to all of you on here for giving me your time and posting it really has helped so very much.

plumblusher Sun 18-Sep-11 12:51:54

Hello again ladies,have just spoken to my midwife and asked for a bit more information about my results. She said that the nuchal measurements from the baby came back normal, the problem was my blood results. I tried to book the appt for the cvs test on Tues but DH cant make it so I'm booking it for Thursday instead. She also said that they may not be able to do the cvs because of how far along I'll be at the time and it may be that I have to have the amnio anyway. Was tempted to go on Tues on my own but DH wasnt keen. It's going to be an agonising few days.

LaLaLaLayla Sun 18-Sep-11 15:36:21

So, if you went on Tuesday could they do the CVS?

plumblusher Sun 18-Sep-11 16:37:55

Not necessarily, midwife said they would give me an ultrasound to see the position of the baby and go from there. The same will apply on Thursday too, they do an u/s then decide whether the baby is in a good/safe position for the procedure i think? The appt is booked Thursday at 10:00 so I will just take it from there. Apart from my DH I've not told any family or friends about my situation so MN has been a god send.smile

BaldricksTurnip Sun 18-Sep-11 20:45:56

No helpful advice but thinking of you and really hope you have a positive outcome x

chipmonkey Sun 18-Sep-11 21:38:55

plumblusher I am wondering if what happened to me may have happened to you?

I had a big bleed in early pregnancy and passed a clot about the size of a plum. I really thought I had miscarried but when I was scanned the doctor found a baby with a heartbeat.

When I went for a further scan with my obs he pointed out a second empty pregnancy sac beside the one with the baby so it seemed that I had originally been pregnant with twins and lost one.

My nuchal result was 1:189 which I know is not as bad as yours but still high risk. Some research seemed to show that twin pregnancies can result in high levels of free beta HcG. which is usually the one which also suggests Down Syndrome.

I opted not to have any further tests.

My dd was born at 28 weeks ( this was due to placenta Accreta, so nothing to do with earlier bleeding or blood results) and although she is very prem and is still in hospital, she doesn't have Down Syndrome or any other trisomy and looks to be healthy. smile

Really hope it all works out for you. My feeling is that because the nuchal fold iteself is good, as it was in my case, the baby is more likely to be OK. All sorts of things can throw the bloods off.

DontTellAnyonebut Mon 19-Sep-11 17:14:08

chipmonkey i don't think your can weight the nuchal fold like that as my measurements were both awful but the babies were fine. The importance of the nuchal fold measurement is already calculated.

I hope your baby is thriving.

plumblusher Tue 20-Sep-11 20:15:21

Feeling very nervous now. I'm wondering just how painful this is going to be? And also should I expect to bleed much if at all afterwards? Also do I need to have a full bladder like you do for a dating scan? Can't believe how happy and excited and full of life I felt last week and how one phonecall can send your life in a spin of uncertainty.

HardCheese Tue 20-Sep-11 20:48:28

Sending every possible good wish your way, plumblusher.

FannyLogan Tue 20-Sep-11 21:03:10

I have been there and it is a horrible time. I expected to be ringing people to tell them I was pregnant, posting on facebook, but instead I was reeling from a 1 in 3 risk of DS.

I had an amnio instead of the CVS. It was no more painful than a blood test, just a bit uncomfortable - I imagine CVS is similar.

I had it on the Wed, fast results were back 8pm on Friday night - DS is fine, were were lucky - wishing the same for you.

All the best for Thursday. xx

ghislaine Tue 20-Sep-11 22:00:25

It doesn't hurt much plumblusher - a prick when the local anaesthetic is given, and then a sort of pulling sensation as they remove the cells. It's not completely painfree, but is more about weird sensations than anything else. Afterwards you might feel crampy for a couple of days.

I think you need to have an empty bladder. I know I was asked to empty mine for the second one. I didn't bleed at all, either time. I know some people have but haven't miscarried. This is a pretty comprehensive guide to cvs (there are pictures on p 6 (not photos) of the procedure if you want to skip over them):

fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/getdata.php?id=11111 (this should work if you cut and paste into your browser.)

All the best. I think the waiting and wondering is worse than the actual cvs, which will be over in minutes.

DontTellAnyonebut Wed 21-Sep-11 07:54:20

I didnt have local anaesthetic as the harvest point is where you feel the scratching sensation (at the uterus). There is no point putting in a local to the uterus as you'd have to get the same trajectory after waiting for 5 minutes for it to numb.

So, in the two i've had. I laid still, closed my eyes and counted while the doctor talked through what he was doing and seeing. The second time he went in twice and i never felt either entry on my tummy. I got to 22 elephants the first CVS and 34 the second. It does not hurt but does feel strange.

The idea and anticipation is the worst. In regards to bleeding you may have a tiny bit of spotting a few hours later. I didn't have it either time.

plumblusher Thu 22-Sep-11 17:34:08

Well I've had my CVS, tears trickled out of my eyes when I lay on the table, not from pain, but worry and anxiety. It was a strange sensation, not exactly painful just discomfort. I closed my eyes through the whole thing until they told me it was over and showed me the baby's beating heart. Felt a bit painful after when walking to the car and by the time I got home, bit like I'd been kicked in the side with a football boot, so had a couple of paracetamol. Glad I didn't look cos DH said the needle was on the large side. I feel relieved I've had it done and feel I've made the right decision, now I just have to wait for the results, which we should have by Tuesday. That is going to be a long long wait and to be honest I fear the results.
Thank you all so much for taking the time to post on here for me, you have all been my support network when I've felt I've nowhere else to turn (didn't want to worry family and friends) so a huge thanks.

ghislaine Thu 22-Sep-11 18:07:43

Good to hear from you plumblusher. I was thinking of you at 10.20 this morning.

Endogirl Thu 22-Sep-11 18:38:27

Hi plumblusher. I haven't posted before but I have been following your thread and wishing good thoughts for you.

I'm so glad that it wasn't too bad in the end. It'll be a long weekend waiting for the results so make sure you've got lots to distract yourself with but I would advise resting up for a little bit. I found I was a bit uncomfy for a couple of days afterwards so I just watched cheesy movies and ate comfort food which sort of helped. The waiting part is definitely the worst bit.

I'm crossing my fingers that you get good news with the results on Tuesday.

xxxxx

DontTellAnyonebut Thu 22-Sep-11 19:33:51

So glad the first hurdle has been cleared. Crossing fingers for you. Time is relentless, you will have your results very soon.

jugglingwiththreeshoes Thu 22-Sep-11 19:56:00

Possibly a slightly alternative viewpoint but I would not have any further investigations because they are both slightly invasive and have a slight chance of miscarriage.
I had a nuchal scan with my first because it was offered and non-invasive and I felt it might give me some reassurance. I was lucky and was given low risk of DS. But the risk you've been given is still only 5%. Whereas the risk of miscarriage is 1% or 0.75% respectively (I think). To me this is too high a risk, especially given that you've suffered MC before sad
With my second pregnancy no nuchal scan was offered and so I had no tests other than my two scans.
Just because you've had the nuchal scan it doesn't mean you have to continue along the testing route if invasive tests carrying a small risk are not acceptable to you.
Also you need to consider how you would feel if child did have DS. To me that risk was one I was prepared to take ( as feel DS children can have a good life and be part of a loving family ) compared to the risk of losing the pregnancy.
But that's just my viewpoint.
Good luck with whatever decisions and tests you choose to have.
HTH ( not sure if it does ! )

jugglingwiththreeshoes Thu 22-Sep-11 20:01:33

Sorry, I should have read all thread before posting.
Try not to worry about the results, remember it's likely all will be well.

DontTellAnyonebut Fri 23-Sep-11 07:08:29

Jugglingwiththreeshoes your stats on losing a baby through miscarriage with CVS are outdated.

Hope you're doing OK today plumblusher

rhetorician Fri 23-Sep-11 12:56:21

yes, agree with don'ttell - you should be able to get specific stats for a given unit/consultant. Our consultant has a m/c rate of 1/300 - how it's calculated I'm not sure, as he said he had never experienced a woman having a mc as a result of cvs.

plumblusher just a quick hand-hold. The waiting is pure agony - I remember it well (we were you, back in june - 1:11 risk. All was well) - try and keep busy

plumblusher Sun 25-Sep-11 18:35:06

This waiting is horrendous, this feels like possibly the longest weekend ever. I'm glad I'm back at work tomorrow because at least I'll be busy and the day will hopefully fly by.
On the night of the CVS I was upstairs watching telly and felt a warm 'trickle' down below. I thought the worst and when I went to the loo expected to find blood. It wasn't blood but a watery fluid. When I told DH he immediately phoned Mw's and then our local NHS service. The doctor on the phone asked him if it was urine! I think I'd have known if I'd wet myself! He then said that it was probably a small amount of amniotic fluid that had seaped from the incision point that hadn't quite healed yet, as there was no bleeding and I wasn't in pain there was no need to worry.
I do and don't want Tuesday to be here I am so scared its ridiculous! Could really do with a stiff drink or something, but that is out of the question isn't it!

jugglingwiththreeshoes Sun 25-Sep-11 18:52:12

Re the stats that don'ttellanyone queried, I was merely using the info that plumblusher provided but attempting to put it into a percentage - I think I may have got the maths slightly wrong, so apologies if that is the case blush
As you say the procedures are always being improved and the risks lessened.
Sorry to hear you've been worried about both MC and the results plumblusher
I hope everything goes really well on Tuesday and you can stop worrying.

DontTellAnyonebut Sun 25-Sep-11 19:21:45

Plumblusher the w/e is nearly over and Tuesday will be here very soon. The 'trickle' sounds nerve wracking but try to stay calm. By the way, when i had my first NT scan the Dr asked how i was feeling and i said that quipped that i was regretting giving up smoking. She told me to go home and have a ciggie, it wasn't going to do anything, so i did. Then cried.

mrsbrooks Mon 26-Sep-11 15:00:20

Hey, I was given a 1:2 chance of DS with a 4.5 NT and results came back negative so there is hope for everyone. Cvs scan is vital to put your mind at ease but quite painful. And dont listen to drs cos they told me there was no hope for my bb. Hope u get good news soon x

mummytoh1 Mon 26-Sep-11 17:52:39

Hi plumblusher, hope you're doing ok. I know you're anxiously waiting for your results and I know from personal experience how awful that wait is.

We were given a 1:15 for our second son, mostly from one of the blood results but he's absolutely fine and now 5 months old. Wanted to wish you all the best for your results tomorrow.

plumblusher Mon 26-Sep-11 18:25:57

Well one more day to go, had a totally sleepless night last night so hoping tonight will be better. Tomorrow is nearly here. Once again thank you for all your posts and support. smile

DontTellAnyonebut Mon 26-Sep-11 18:29:55

<quick hand squeeze>

Endogirl Mon 26-Sep-11 21:00:40

Everything is crossed for you. I hope you manage to get a little sleep tonight. xxxxx

jugglingwiththreeshoes Mon 26-Sep-11 21:03:49

I always find, whatever the situation, after one sleepless night I always sleep better the next night - because I'm knackered! Hope the same is true for you x

Taffeta Mon 26-Sep-11 21:05:30

plum - thinking of you, have been there. The waiting is just the worst. All the very best for tomorrow.

x

mrsbigz Mon 26-Sep-11 21:13:45

just wanted to say i'll be thinking of you tomorrow xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

mrsbigz Tue 27-Sep-11 14:10:25

hi hun - any news yet? hope today is not passing too slowly for you and you've things to distract you while waiting for the call xxx

DontTellAnyonebut Tue 27-Sep-11 17:36:36

Thinking of you today. x

plumblusher Tue 27-Sep-11 19:26:05

Well the wait is finally over thank goodness. I didn't have the courage to make the call so my DH did and then he rang me. The news is good, the results came back as normal and I feel a huge weight has been lifted. I'm so glad I had the CVS and feel I can finally enjoy this pregnancy and embrace my growing little bump instead of detaching myself mentally for fear of the worst.
Every single one of you have helped me through this and I simply can not thank you enough. You have been the family and friends I really needed over the last week or so. I send every single one of you a hug and a massive thank you.
A 1:20 chance seemed much easier to cope with when it was put as a 5% chance and that's thanks to you. Everything seemed to be put into pespective and became much easier to cope with.
Anyway the wait is over it is happy news today and we've celebrated with a take away. I shall sleep well tonight LOVE TO YOU ALL THANKS FOR BEING THERE FOR ME XXXXX thanks

ghislaine Tue 27-Sep-11 19:40:22

Wonderful news - so pleased for you!

FannyLogan Tue 27-Sep-11 20:07:39

I have been looking out for this. Congratulations! Fabulous news!!

WipsGlitter Tue 27-Sep-11 20:17:37

Great news- enjoy your pregancy!

mrsbigz Tue 27-Sep-11 20:25:46

fantastic news - thank you for the update xxxxx

Endogirl Tue 27-Sep-11 20:28:15

That is absolutely fantastic news. I am so so so pleased for you. xxxx

mummytoh1 Tue 27-Sep-11 20:34:12

Excellent news, I'm so so so pleased for you. Make sure you go out and buy yourself a little something to celebrate, you've been through a lot. x

pyjamasinbananas Tue 27-Sep-11 20:38:04

Excellent news. Very happy for you smile enjoy the pregnancy

Taffeta Tue 27-Sep-11 21:16:40

plum - so, so pleased for you. x

chipmonkey Wed 28-Sep-11 00:26:07

grin So happy for you!

DontTellAnyonebut Wed 28-Sep-11 04:00:57

That is fantastic news. I'm thrilled for you. Now look after yourself...

jugglingwiththreeshoes Wed 28-Sep-11 08:39:05

Oh, that's great news plum !
Hope I didn't say the wrong things ( as I'm not a great fan of these tests) , but seems like if I did I've been forgiven anyway !smile
Have some flowers too ! thanks

rhetorician Wed 28-Sep-11 12:49:10

that's great news plum - and I can tell you the memory of those horrible days does gradually fade and you start to have confidence in the pregnancy again. But would echo everything you said about the value of the support on here - I dont think we would have made it without it - that's why I periodically check in and offer support where I can.

delighted for you

Ayeshassan Tue 25-Dec-18 22:36:07

I m given the chance of trisomy 21 1:20 what does that mean? Can any one help am I on the higher risk or lower risk?i m going to have aminocentesis Tom
I m so worried

SylvanianFrenemies Fri 28-Dec-18 15:39:26

@ayeshassan you'd probably be better to start your own thread in Antenatal tests, this is a very old one and people may not see your message.

T21 is Downs Syndrome.

1/20 is in the high side. However, it still means you only have a 5% risk, or a 19/20 chance all is well. The amnio results are usually quick, I hope it goes well for you.

Ayeshassan Wed 02-Jan-19 00:29:25

I had my amino done and will get the fish results tomorrow
Need prayers

Ayeshassan Thu 03-Jan-19 06:10:21

They called me and said they didn’t get the accurate fish results so I have to wait for the detailed one,can any one tell me why is it happens that the fish results doesn’t appear or what?
I m hell worried plz help

WipsGlitter Thu 03-Jan-19 07:29:12

Hi, you'd probably be best starting your own thread on this

WipsGlitter Thu 03-Jan-19 07:31:55

Sorry I've just seen you've done that. Poor test results can happen for lots of reasons eg getting an insufficient sample.

What you might be best doing is considering what you would do if the result comes back positive for DS as you might have to decide quickly if you want to continue the pregnancy.

Helsvamp Thu 10-Jan-19 11:49:20

You can have a nonvasive test none just involves taking blood from arm and will not hurt baby but will cost like £400 I had a 1 in 12 chance and after the non vasive I found out 99 percent chance baby was in the clear

Join the discussion

Registering is free, quick, and means you can join in the discussion, watch threads, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Get started »