Am incredably hormonal tonight so please tell me to shut up if I'm talking crap!
I'm disabled, so tend to take taxis to the bus stop as I can't walk that far. Today I got one from the bus stop to my ante natal class, and once again the taxi driver wasn't wearing a belt. There are signs all over the taxi declaring "By law you are required to wear your seatbelt" etc, and this must be the sixth time in two weeks I've got in a taxi and the driver doesn't belt up.
It really annoys me!! I know that if there was an accident or whatever it would be their own selves they would be putting in danger, but surely it isn't unreasonable to think they should practice what their car preeches..?
I recall taxi drivers are legally entitled not to wear seatbelts, I think it is based on the fact they are picking up strangers and being strapped to their seat makes them more vulnerable to attack.
It is a legal requirement to wear a seatbelt as a passenger, the taxi insurers probably require them to display the reminder. And in the back seat, you could injure the driver if you were thrown forward (remember those awful adverts?).
IMO seatbelt-wearing should be voluntary in the front seat. Obligatory in the back, definitely, because (a) a passenger thrown forward in a crash could kill the person in the front seat, and (b) the driver is to an extent responsible for the person in the back. But in the front, while I'm quite happy for your insurance to require you to belt up, I think it should be up to the individual to decide - to take responsibility for themselves.
So IMO YABU. I have no issues with taxi drivers (or any other drivers ) not belting up.
Taxi drivers are just as obliged to wear seatbelts as anyone else. The only people exempt from wearing them are delivery drivers where they are getting in adn out of their vehicle every few minutes.
Prettycandles,I have never heard such a pile of the proverbial in my life. Maybe you'd like to come out wiht one of my traffic colleagues one day and see the results of not wearing a belt in a fatal RTC ?
DH is a black cab driver and is exempt from wearing seatbelt whilst carrying passengers. Have a feeling it may be one of the Public Carriage Office rules as I questioned it too.
If he picks up a parcel instead of a passenger he has to wear his belt though..
Think it has something to do with getting your passengers out in an emergency.
I'd prefer him to wear it as it makes him forget to when he's driving our car too . He does if he's doing a motorway job though. Do you mean black cab or minicab as think this only applies to black cabs?
My local taxi company don't wear seatbelts and always have them fastened behind the seat because one of their drivers was restrained by the passenger pulling on it befre stabbing and robbing him, this was a long time ago I think but it makes sense I guess.
Fibilou, as it happens some years ago I spent a day patrolling a stretch of motorway with the police, during the course of which we attended an accident. I, too, have been in an accident where my seatbelt probably saved my face and chest. I have had to make emergency stops where my dcs' seatbelts and carseats undoubtedly protected them. I have seen an accident where the two women in the car were flung, not just out of the car, but several metres up the embankment against which they had crashed.
I do not argue against using seatbelts. I argue for people to take responsibility for their own well-being. I do not like the nanny-state. I resent its intervention in my own autonomy when my decisions do not threaten the well-being of others.