My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

Royals being put to sleep to give birth? *MNHQ edited the title for some sort of clarity*

297 replies

Butterandsugar · 13/03/2018 12:44

Posting in here for traffic, and also in case my lack of experience is at play here.

I have just been advised that when the royal family are due to deliver their babies they are put to sleep and someone else does the "work" for them because it is deemed too traumatic an experience.

Note, apparently this isn't a long winded and not really accurate attempt at saying they have caesarians.

I have scoffed at this, but an being told that this truly is the case. AIBU to not see how this is physically possible? And why on earth something like giving birth is deemed below the royals if so?

OP posts:
Report
ChelleDawg2020 · 13/03/2018 12:46

Source please.

Report
smoothliminal · 13/03/2018 12:47

By 'I have just been advised' do you mean 'I just dreamed this and now I think it's true'?

Report
KitKatCHA · 13/03/2018 12:47

I really thought this was going to be about having the Queen put down Blush

Report
RaptorInaPorkPieHat · 13/03/2018 12:48

Me too KitKat Grin

Report
Branleuse · 13/03/2018 12:48

I think that used to happen a few years back, not just to monarchs, but a sleeping anaesthetised labour was deemed a good thing. There were masses of problems with it. I dont think it still happens usually, and not in the same way

Report
LeighaJ · 13/03/2018 12:49

Which tabloid did you read this in? 🤔

Report
Branleuse · 13/03/2018 12:49
Report
MrsHathaway · 13/03/2018 12:49

Are you thinking about Queen Victoria ? She was so impressed with how much easier it had been to have DC7 under chloroform that she recommended it to everyone and did the same for DC8.

Report
GinIsIn · 13/03/2018 12:49

I don’t know who’s advising you, but I suggest you find someone else..... Confused

Report
Butterandsugar · 13/03/2018 12:49

It sounds ridiculous doesn't it? My manager in work is adamant this is what happens.

She's normally very logical and sensible

OP posts:
Report
KurriKurri · 13/03/2018 12:49

Who advised you? Unless it was the Queen's obstetrician I would say your advisor is talking bollocks.

Report
Tink2007 · 13/03/2018 12:49

I fully expected this to say the Duke of Edinburgh has been put to sleep.

Report
Butterandsugar · 13/03/2018 12:50

I don't read tabloids

OP posts:
Report
tomatosalt · 13/03/2018 12:50

Twilight sedation during labour was once popular for well off women. Apparently the queen gave birth this way herself:
babyology.com.au/pregnancy/birth/were-still-recovering-from-the-queens-twilight-birth-scene-in-the-crown.html

Report
Piffpaffpoff · 13/03/2018 12:50

I think that was quite a ‘normal’ process for many mothers in the olden days, it was called twighlight sleep or something?

They showed it being used on The Queen in ‘The Crown’ - here’s a blog about it.

I really doubt it happens now though.

Report
MrsHathaway · 13/03/2018 12:50

I think your manager has been reading too many shitty magazines and gossip websites Grin

Report
LeighaJ · 13/03/2018 12:50

Branleuse

Wait...really? As scared of labour as I am I would find the idea of being knocked out cold for it even scarier.

Report
Asheth · 13/03/2018 12:50

Queen Victoria used to be given chloroform to knock her out when she gave birth. She considered it miraculous after her first few births with no pain relief and the use in childbirth was widespread. I think modern royals use safer forms of pain relief like the rest of us!

Report
FifiVoldemortsChavvyCousin · 13/03/2018 12:50

The reason general anaesthetic is not used for labour is that whenever a person is put under there is a good chance they will not wake up. It is only in the 20th century anaesthetics have become more reliable. I doubt any doctor would have risked death to avoid trauma.

Report
retirednow · 13/03/2018 12:51

Has she been watching series 2 of The Crown

Report
LooksBetterWithAFilter · 13/03/2018 12:52

Wonder if this comes from the Netflix series The Crown where the queen is drugged and Edward pulled out of her.
It wasn’t something exclusive to Royals. It’s called Twilight sleep and women were given drugs to keep them semi conscious during labour. It was horrible and traumatic for babies and mothers.

Report
BevBrook · 13/03/2018 12:52

Queen Victoria, after having seven kids, demanded chloroform for her eighth. This ushered in an era of heavily medicalised births (not for everyone, but also not just for royalty). It was then realised this led to all kinds of problems for babies and mums, and it stopped.
Disclaimer: I got that from a quick browse of the internet and a vague knowledge of history.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 13/03/2018 12:53

I suspect that this is a load of total baloney!

It might have happened in the past - there was something called Twilight Sleep, where women were given a powerful drug that not only provided analgesia during childbirth, it also erased the memory of birth altogether.

It used morphine and scopolamine, but the latter had some pretty horrific side effects, according to this article:

"Scopolamine caused women to lose their inhibitions, and have no conscious awareness of what was happening to them. The small amount of morphine used didn’t prevent pain, but contributed to women becoming uninhibited, and even psychotic. Many women would thrash around, bang their heads on walls, claw at themselves or staff, and scream constantly. They would either be restrained on their beds, by their wrists and ankles, or put into straight jackets.

Often blinded by towels wrapped around their heads to prevent injury, they would be put into ‘labour cribs’ – cot-like beds that prevented them from falling to the floor. They would remain on the beds, bound and screaming, often lying in their own vomit and waste, for as long as it took for labour to end."

This practice was used in the early years of the 20th century, but soon fell out of favour, due to the side effects, and risks to the baby.

I highly doubt that any obstetrician would perform a caesarian unless it was medically necessary.

Report
Queenoftheblitz · 13/03/2018 12:53

I don't believe the current queen did that. I know someone on private phone number terms with her and she's very down to earth and says "fuck" a lot.
I bet her lazy mother went for the knock out though.

Report
twer · 13/03/2018 12:54

I clicked on this thinking there was a mass cull of monarch butterflies.

Blush

(As you were...)

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.