Does everybody get this result on Google?

[Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g]

Try entering this: women killed in 2017. See what the first page of results looks like. I'll post a screenshot of what I got in a bit.

[RebeccaCloud9]

[Rebeccaslicker]

Someone's been busy.

Very very busy.

[meredintofpandiculation]

Lots of transgender stuff. But google personalises, so that could be because I spend lots of time on mumsnet which has lots of transgender threads. Much more balanced selection using duckduckgo

[Babyiwantabump]

😯 if you get the same OP that’s outrageous!

[Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g]

I got this.

[bluecashmere]

Do not Google this and then click on the top result. That's the kind of thing that makes this the top result.

[falsepriest]

0 Days Since... etc.

[Calvinlookingforhobbs]

This is horrendous. There is an agenda to push trans acceptance on us all.

[AyeAyeFishyPie]

Wtf?!

[Nottheduchessofcambridge]

Shocking! I googled and the first 6 were trans!

[Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g]

I just saw a thread on Twitter about this. A man (I assume) who posts gender critical stuff there got a very similar result. I saw something similar either here or on Twitter a few months ago. I don't think it's a coincidence that so many trans-identifying people work in tech.

I know Google's algorithm takes into account the other things you search for. But on my search history if I looked for women killed in 2017 the sites I've looked at in the past are far more likely to be about violence against women and girls.

[TheWizardofWas]

that is kind of weird....

[bluecashmere]

If you googled 'women murdered in 2017' etc you would not get this result.

This one comes up time and time again.

[Bringmewineandcake]

Shit

[TheWizardofWas]

I got exactly the same as Gasp and I don't spend any time looking up trans stuff.

[TheWizardofWas]

i got it pretty similar with women murdered.

[Rawhh]

Oh FFS! Google personalise it results based on your internet history.

There is no untoward agenda to bring Transacceptance on us all - merely a push to accept people for who they have a biological urge to be.

Attitudes such as Calvins have echoes of the types of things that were said before homosexuality was acceptable.

[Pickleypickles]

My top two are trans and then two about women and then two more about trans people. To my knowledge ive never googled anything about trans people in the past. Definately not in the last 2 or 3 months and i google everything so its not due to past search results or cookies.

[Iwasjustabouttosaythat]

I got it too. That is absolutely appalling. Ever feel like you’ve been deleted?

[Rebeccaslicker]

Well - I got the same results, but I've never really googled anything trans related, and esp not in the last fortnight since I upgraded my phone. My internet history on this new phone is almost exclusively MN, "white gloss kitchens", "grey roll top baths" and clothes for children!

[Iwasjustabouttosaythat]

I have never googled trans issues, as it goes. I have however very recently googled several abducted girls and women.

[bluecashmere]

Rawhh you're wrong. It's not just about your internet history. The algorithms are far more complex than that and it's easy to boost certain pages with SEO techniques - which I'm sure is part of what's going on here.

[Talith]

I got the same results as you OP and I've not been involved in the transgender debates here or anywhere else, they're not normally threads I'd contribute to.

[PiecesOfHate]

I got a pageful of trans stuff. This has NOTHING to do with my internet history as I've never googled or investigated trans issues ever, and avoid the trans threads on here.

Yes, I find it sinister. If I google "women" or "women" then why wouldn't actual, real women who must make up at least 99% of people calling themselves such not feature at all in the first page of results? Very strange algorithm on there.

[sallyandherarmy]

I googled Women MURDERED in 2017

Wow.

I feel sick.