Following on from previous thread which was filled.
What would have been the correct way to deal with these little boys who subjected a tiny two year old to protracted agony and unimaginable suffering then?
Interested to know what all the bleeding hearts on here believe should have happened? Whether they attended an adult court and were convicted of murder which they confessed to anyway, was this crueller to them than what they put that child through? They were well treated and even when they were serving their 'sentence' they were protected and given all they wanted (more than they would have got if they'd been in their own homes probably) and had all the help and therapy it was possible to give them. Did they suffer? You could actually argue that they benefitted from killing. They have to live with what they've done, yes, but if they did I find it hard to comprehend that Thompson especially (who came across as the leader in the interviews) can.
The Norwegian case which is often compared to this is nowhere similar IMO. The perpetrators were a similar age to their victim. They were 6 which is almost half the age V&T were and they wouldn't have been tried here anyway. Most importantly that crime was not premeditated or drawn out for hours like the many horrors inflicted on James.
He was the only victim here.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
The Bulger killers: was justice done?
999 replies
WannaBeWonderWoman · 08/02/2018 00:07
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.