My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

to think MNHQ should know better than to feature photos of babies in headbands (preumably to denote female) on this site?

207 replies

bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:01

Of all places!

Come on HQ. Pull your finger out!

OP posts:
Report
SF25 · 17/12/2016 22:09

You what? Hmm

Report
Nan0second · 17/12/2016 22:12

I agree that they're awful and we don't need a sign that a child is female. However everyone else will tell you that YABU

Report
AliceInUnderpants · 17/12/2016 22:14

Why? Apparent from headbands on babies being ugly on the majority of case I've seen, what heinous crime have they committed?

Report
littleoysterslittleoysters · 17/12/2016 22:14

YABU

Report
AVirginLitTheCandle · 17/12/2016 22:17

But if they don't wear headbands then people might think they're a boy.

Report
bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:17

SF25 - the photo that captions Blog Of The Day on the right of your screen. "What if babies were on Facebook?" - four little babies in nappies sat around a laptop, two of them have white headbands on. Two with headbands on, two without. I wonder why?

OP posts:
Report
bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:18

Care to expand littleoysters?

OP posts:
Report
AliceInUnderpants · 17/12/2016 22:24

I'm guessing they looked for a stock photo of babies playing with a laptop and thought that was the best one for whatever reason. I don't think it's likely to be in anyway related to gender-stereotyping and/or feminism.

Maybe you should contact the photographer.

Report
AliceInUnderpants · 17/12/2016 22:25

Personally, I'd have picked this one, as she looks like she has her serious 'someone on the internet has pissed me off' face on.

to think MNHQ should know better than to feature photos of babies in headbands (preumably to denote female) on this site?
Report
MothersRuinart · 17/12/2016 22:26

YABU.

Report
Sallystyle · 17/12/2016 22:26

Shock horror, one also has pink socks on!

Back in the real world, no one really gives a shit that a website uses a stock photo where two babies are wearing head bands.

Report
bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:27

Yes, Alice, I'm guessing they looked for a stock photo of babies looking at a laptop and they should have known better than to choose that particular one.

If you can point me in the direction of how to contact the photographer, I will happily do so.

OP posts:
Report
bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:29

Me and Nan0 do, so that's two of us.

HQ are behind Let Toys Be Toys aren't they? Why not Let Bald Baby Heads Be Bald Baby Heads?

OP posts:
Report
Castleheights · 17/12/2016 22:29

I have no fucks to give about this non issue

Report
1stTimeMama · 17/12/2016 22:30

I think I'm totally missing the point? What's wrong with girl babies being out in headbands?

Report
AliceInUnderpants · 17/12/2016 22:33

Can I also take issue with the fact that the visible nappies appear to be disposable? And none of them have cradle cap? Or glasses?

Report
Sallystyle · 17/12/2016 22:34

Because some MN users have a bee in their bonnet over gender stereotyping MNHQ should agree with you and go along with it? Perhaps they actually don't give a shit about this issue.

Yeah, gender stereotyping is an important issue for many, but they might not care as much as you do and they don't need to pull their finger out because they posted a photo that some members don't like.

Report
bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:34

Oh lord. Yes you are missing the point FirstTimeMama.

Ask yourself - why does a "girl baby" need to be embellished with a headband? And why do we, looking at that photo, need to know that two of them are girls and two of them are boys?

OP posts:
Report
Hobnobbing · 17/12/2016 22:34

Erm some people like to put headbands on their daughters, my DD doesn't look particularly girly and 99 times out of 100 doesn't wear a headband and doesn't wear girly clothes but I have the right to put one on her if the mood strikes.
Are we not meant to put them on baby girls nowadays so as not to offend people with too much time on their hands?

Report
Sallystyle · 17/12/2016 22:34

It could be possible that the ones without headbands are also girls.

Report
AliceInUnderpants · 17/12/2016 22:36
Report
Boundaries · 17/12/2016 22:36

Headbands on babies are stupid. MN should not champion them.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

bibbitybobbityyhat · 17/12/2016 22:38

U2 don't be so reductive. Gender stereotyping is a really important issue (not a bee in a bonnet) and I understood (although clearly am wrong) that HQ were firmly against it.

The nappies and glasses argument just doesn't work Alice because both sexes wear both.

OP posts:
Report
MrsJayy · 17/12/2016 22:39

Baby girl in headband shocker you know some parents actually like bows and frills it is not a crime it does not demean girls and why do you think mumsnet of all websites is above showing babies in a hair band

Report
SalemSaberhagen · 17/12/2016 22:39

My DD wore a headband to stop her curly thick hair from getting in her eyes. She was born with almost a full Afro. Please tell me why that is 'stupid'.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.