Is it just me or is MN giving a lot of coverage to those opposing the new non invasive prenatal screening tests the NHS wants to introduce. Today's blog of the day, Sally Phillips at Blogfest and there was a guest post against screening a while ago too.
Full respect to these women and the choices they've made but isn't the crux of the argument about women's choice?
The NHS already screens for Down's, Edwards and Pateau's but the new test will be safer and can be done earlier. It's only going to be offered to women who would otherwise be advised to have amnios/CVS.
So it's a less invasive, faster, less scary, safer way of women getting the information they want to make an informed decision right for them.
Odd that MN's seem to be giving a platform to the anti-argument with no counter-balance?
AIBU?
To think MN is taking a strange stance on the NIPT test?
eeyoresgrumpierfriend · 03/10/2016 15:35
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.