I read the Daily Mail, along with every other national newspaper, because I am a retired journalist and it's force of habit.
But today, there's this disgraceful article about a poor child who has a medical condition that means she's matured far too early. Her dear mother has not just publicised her daughter's condition, but there are photographs of the little girl too.
Some comments after the article say sanctimoniously that oh yes, the condition needs to be 'publicised'. OK, yes, but WHY not use pseudonyms for the mother and daughter and definitely NO PHOTOGRAPHS. The little girl's privacy has been horribly invaded, full details of her premature development. I am amazed that the Mail - and the mother - are allowed to do this. What is the child going to go through at school, now her condition is so blatantly publicised? Did the mother get paid for divulging these details of the poor little girl?
I've hesitated to put the link here, but I will. Hope MNs will protest (my comment didn't appear, surprise surprise) but I'm also writing to the editor of the DM and complaining to IPSO.
www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3756708/She-looks-like-friends-Mother-says-daughter-robbed-childhood-started-puberty-aged-just-SIX.html#comments
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
This is surely a new low for the Daily Mail
17 replies
oldgrandmama · 25/08/2016 20:28
OP posts:
DixieWishbone ·
26/08/2016 02:23
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.