My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To think that 'like putting lipstick on a pig' smacks of misogyny?

18 replies

Beckadillo · 13/06/2016 21:32

This term is used a LOT in DH's office, in reference to pretty-ing up crap websites. He feels uncomfortable using it, and has asked my opinion as to whether it sounds misogynistic.

My feeling is that yes, it sounds that way, but I don't think that's the intention. It's just a horrible expression generally, IMO.

What do you think? And what expressions can he try to get going to replace it? Am personally in favour of 'like rolling shit in glitter'. Far lovelier Grin

OP posts:
Report
CustardLover · 13/06/2016 21:45

Agreed. I hate this phrase. Shit in glitter is much prettier :)

Report
EatShitDerek · 13/06/2016 21:47

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BelfastBloke · 13/06/2016 21:49

Obama used the phrase, and was accused of being misogynist toward Sarah Palin.

Report
Shakey15000 · 13/06/2016 21:49

Never heard of it

I get the gist of what it's alluding to but not seeing the misogyny either.

Report
Beckadillo · 13/06/2016 21:50

I don't think it actually is, Derek, just that it sounds it (pig being, obviously, a totally vile way of referencing an unattractive woman)

OP posts:
Report
Tiggeryoubastard · 13/06/2016 21:51

No misogyny there. May be pig ist (or is the PC term porcine ist) but definitely no misogyny.

Report
DoinItFine · 13/06/2016 21:52

It porcophobic certainly.

What does it have to do with women?

Is "polishing a turd" misogynistic because women do more polishing?

Or shinier shites?

Report
EatShitDerek · 13/06/2016 21:53

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Tiggeryoubastard · 13/06/2016 21:54

Porcophobic. I've extended my vocabulary today.

Report
ABCAlwaysBeCunting · 13/06/2016 21:54

I don't see it as misogynistic. I don't think 'pig' is solely applied to women in a derogatory way either.

Report
VestalVirgin · 13/06/2016 21:55

As a card-carrying feminist, I do not find it particularly misogynist. Though possibly inaccurate - lipstick does not make anyone prettier, or disguise the real appearance.

Rolling shit in glitter is more accurate.

Report
BYOSnowman · 13/06/2016 21:55

I would say it is referencing the fact that make up is used to make a woman (or man!) more attractive. By putting make up on a pig it isn't referring to an ugly woman but just saying you can't make a pig more attractive because they are ugly animals (poor pigs)

If you changed it to 'you can't put a pig in a tux' it has the same sentiment but isn't implying the pig is really an ugly man.

I also have never heard an ugly woman called a pig but have heard 'dog'

Report
Tiggeryoubastard · 13/06/2016 21:55

Oh, and exactly what eatshit said. Your DH sounds quite tedious, OP.

Report
Beckadillo · 13/06/2016 21:55

Fair enough, shall suggest he needn't worry too much about offending anyone, barring his boss, Peppa...

OP posts:
Report
DoinItFine · 13/06/2016 21:55

I made porcophobic up.

Report
EatShitDerek · 13/06/2016 21:57

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Tiggeryoubastard · 13/06/2016 21:58

Today 21:55 DoinItFine

I made porcophobic up.


Bugger! It's there in my head now.

Report
DoinItFine · 13/06/2016 22:05

I just googled it and it looks like Christopher Hitchens made it up before I did.

So it's definitely a word.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.