This isn't the first time this kind of thing has happened unfortunately, and I remember the outrage here when MN used quotes from posters for their books for profit, without asking permission before publishing. Cue a lot of name changes.
In fact and in effect as far as I remember the outcome of those previous cases was that MN own all your posts, and they can do with them what they like, also the press can quote bits and bobs for fair use.
It really is a low blow though when people are posting their heartfelt and truthful memories and emotions and be exposed to comment and ridicule and abused in this way.
I think MN leaves posters feeling like they've been betrayed and are left flapping in the wind TBH. I think they could arrange with media to send a pre publication courtesy post to say that the article will be used in mainstream media before it is printed so a choice can be made to delete your posts.
I do hope that MN delete posts as requested, or indeed the whole thread, but I doubt they'd want to kill the publicity as they seem to court it for traffic.
I'd like to see ownership of posts returned to posters, with copyright reassigned and ownership extended as a moral right to the posters, and permissions having to be sought for use of those posts by all media, but I doubt that will happen if there's a buck to be made.
The only time IME MN actually disassociate ownership of posts is to allow a libel action to be taken against you!! Then they deny all ownership.. indeed we saw this when she who may not be named flexed her muscles against those who voiced their personal opinions against the method she advised.
It's a little bit disingenuous of them and the media I feel. But why have ethics and qualms when there's money to be made selling stuff that you didn't create yourself?
I don't have much respect for journalists, so this wholesale lifting of personal quotes doesn't surprise me. In my opinion they really are getting lazier and lazier. They probably think that sourcing and stealing other people's work is "doing research".
Of course some say that the posts aren't ascribed to a recognisable person per se so posters aren't personally recognisable in real life, but as a pp said the worry is the link with FB where people could potentially be exposed to being personally stalked and targeted.
Also this ignores the fact that people do have an MN identity, they have a recognisable username that potentially they are using for many years and which can identify them throughout their posting history, all of which is available with an advanced search.
My feeling is that MN could up their game a bit and protect the people it makes money from.
Maybe there should be an opt out setting, where quoting posts is strictly forbidden across all media. Or indeed an opt in setting where mn share any profits they make with the quoted posters, i.e. those actually "doing the work".
You could call it a Fair trade forum .
Now there's a radical, empowering idea... I wonder will it catch on?